| Postnuke [message #10310] |
Tue, 27 May 2003 19:55  |
Ala1
Messages: 26
Registered: May 2002
Karma: 0
|
Junior Member |
|
|
What about an interface to postnuke? Is it possible to use the user-management of postnuke and to use FUD as a postnuke-modul?
Maybe this question was already discussed. But I couldn't find something about it with the forum-wide search.
|
|
|
|
| Re: Postnuke [message #10314 is a reply to message #10310] |
Tue, 27 May 2003 21:28  |
Ilia
Messages: 13241
Registered: January 2002
Karma: 0
|
Senior Member
Administrator
Core Developer |
|
|
Technically it is possible to integrate FUDforum with postnuke or similar website management systems. To my knowledge no one had written such an interface yet.
FUDforum Core Developer
|
|
|
|
| Re: Postnuke [message #10484 is a reply to message #10314] |
Mon, 02 June 2003 20:07 |
Gady
Messages: 117
Registered: March 2003
Karma: 0
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Prottoss, could you just sketch out the possible points to pay attention to in order to develop such an integration?
What I can see is:
- one registration/login point;
- session management;
- cookies.
I guess it's far from complete list.
http://www.bccompass.com/forum
|
|
|
|
| Re: Postnuke [message #10494 is a reply to message #10484] |
Mon, 02 June 2003 22:04 |
Ilia
Messages: 13241
Registered: January 2002
Karma: 0
|
Senior Member
Administrator
Core Developer |
|
|
Let's start from the top:
You'll need to develop a common registration system that will automatically register a user on both postnuke & FUDforum. At the same time you'll want to disable registration on FUDforum to prevent creation of user accounts that are unique to any one system.
Then you'll need to develop an interfact that will syncronize common profile settings between FUDforum & PostNuke, so the user does not need to customize their profile twice.
You then need to consider login/logout system, probably disabling the one in either PostNuke or FUDforum and making all the users go through one central system.
The rest is already easy and probably involves just adding a few simple functions allowing PostNuke to get messages from FUDforum for top 10 lists etc...
FUDforum Core Developer
|
|
|
|
| Re: Postnuke [message #10521 is a reply to message #10494] |
Tue, 03 June 2003 18:12 |
Gady
Messages: 117
Registered: March 2003
Karma: 0
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Thanks, prottoss!
**********
You'll need to develop a common registration system that will automatically register a user on both postnuke & FUDforum
************
Could it be just calling appropriate FUD function if you register/login in Postnuke, or appropriate Postnuke function if you register/login in FUD, correspondently?
I just trying to minimize development scope (i'm not talking about developing full feature Postnuke module). Could it be done by some hacks? Maybe no needs (other then perfomance and size)even to merge user tables?
http://www.bccompass.com/forum
|
|
|
|
| Re: Postnuke [message #10522 is a reply to message #10521] |
Tue, 03 June 2003 18:33 |
Ilia
Messages: 13241
Registered: January 2002
Karma: 0
|
Senior Member
Administrator
Core Developer |
|
|
Yes, FUDforum's fud_user_reg class has add_user() and sync_user() methods that will use the data in fud_user_reg class to create or update a user's profile.
FUDforum Core Developer
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Postnuke [message #10528 is a reply to message #10523] |
Tue, 03 June 2003 21:40 |
Ilia
Messages: 13241
Registered: January 2002
Karma: 0
|
Senior Member
Administrator
Core Developer |
|
|
Hmmm FUDforum allows you to specify a cookie name, but the cookie must contain a single text string containing the session identifier. If you can make phpnuke use the same identifier and FUDforum then you could potentially use a common cookie.
Otherwise you will need to change the code in cookie.inc which fetches the session from the cookie.
FUDforum Core Developer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Postnuke [message #13283 is a reply to message #10310] |
Sat, 27 September 2003 14:28 |
Anonymous
|
|
|
|
Where did this ever go?
I really like Fud Forum and so do our people at Baja.net but, it simply must include portal incorp in the relatively near future or we will have to abandon it.
|
|
|
|
| Re: Postnuke [message #13287 is a reply to message #13283] |
Sun, 28 September 2003 18:50 |
Ilia
Messages: 13241
Registered: January 2002
Karma: 0
|
Senior Member
Administrator
Core Developer |
|
|
FUDforum may soon be integrated to work eGroupWare, but there are no plans to allow it to work in *nuke.
FUDforum Core Developer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Postnuke [message #18227 is a reply to message #13328] |
Thu, 13 May 2004 21:31 |
|
|
Hi,
I've been following this thread and wondering how the progress on Postnukizing FUDForum has been going.
Any word yet on a possible integration solution yet? I personally use MD-Pro and PostNuke.
|
|
|
|
| Re: Postnuke [message #18229 is a reply to message #18227] |
Thu, 13 May 2004 22:07 |
Ilia
Messages: 13241
Registered: January 2002
Karma: 0
|
Senior Member
Administrator
Core Developer |
|
|
I have not spent any effort in that direction.
FUDforum Core Developer
|
|
|
|
Calendar
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
]