|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: better design [message #192 is a reply to message #188] |
Wed, 23 January 2002 15:04 |
Ilia
Messages: 13241 Registered: January 2002
Karma: 0
|
Senior Member Administrator Core Developer |
|
|
The Ecxeleron wrote on Wed, 23 January 2002 2:49 AM | Wow, now Fud is perfection, did i mention that Fud is perfection, oh I did. WOW
|
Heh, I am not sure about perfection, but it does look better then it did before.
The reason, I've spent quite a bit of time yesterday tinkering with CSS to it looks the same in Mozilla (the browser I use myself) and IE 6.0. The problem was that IE did not inherit the properties of styles properly and didn't scale fonts as I wanted it to, so I've made a number of changes, which seems to have fixed that.
FUDforum Core Developer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: better design [message #266 is a reply to message #235] |
Tue, 29 January 2002 05:10 |
hackie
Messages: 177 Registered: January 2002
Karma: 0
|
Senior Member Core Developer |
|
|
The Ecxeleron wrote on Mon, 28 January 2002 12:31 AM | well, IE is the standard. He instaled IE, and I made him a better design... seemes fair:)
|
Well, help is certainly appreciated, I do not agree! IE is most certainly *NOT* a standard. Mozilla is much closer to being a standard then IE. I.E. is an excellent browser indeed, it's not a standard. HTML4 is a standard, CSS, DOM are standards, IE is not. Therefor things shouldn't be designed for IE, but for those standards, and IE itself should be designed for them. heh.
Okie, [/rant off]
cc intelligence.c -o intelligence
$ ./intelligence
Segmentation fault
[Updated on: Tue, 29 January 2002 05:11] Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
|
|
Re: better design [message #291 is a reply to message #289] |
Wed, 30 January 2002 06:04 |
hackie
Messages: 177 Registered: January 2002
Karma: 0
|
Senior Member Core Developer |
|
|
The Ecxeleron wrote on Wed, 30 January 2002 12:01 AM | I agree, but IE is on 90% of computers, so it's the standard becuse it's used most.
|
heh.. as I said, I disagree, I can't allow one company to control the net, that would be stupid .. and as I said, IE is NOT a standard... HTML/DOM/CSS are, and they should be followed not IE.. MS should be presured into supporting standards NOT the other way arround.
Did ya try latest mozilla? try it, you might like it over IE.. tabbed browsing rocks!
cc intelligence.c -o intelligence
$ ./intelligence
Segmentation fault
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: better design [message #3227 is a reply to message #291] |
Fri, 14 June 2002 06:14 |
Ecxeleron
Messages: 187 Registered: January 2002 Location: Australia
Karma: 0
|
Senior Member |
|
|
hackie wrote on Wed, 30 January 2002 16:34 |
The Ecxeleron wrote on Wed, 30 January 2002 12:01 AM | I agree, but IE is on 90% of computers, so it's the standard becuse it's used most.
|
heh.. as I said, I disagree, I can't allow one company to control the net, that would be stupid .. and as I said, IE is NOT a standard... HTML/DOM/CSS are, and they should be followed not IE.. MS should be presured into supporting standards NOT the other way arround.
Did ya try latest mozilla? try it, you might like it over IE.. tabbed browsing rocks!
|
Yes, but your tag was incorrect
|
|
|
Re: better design [message #3228 is a reply to message #291] |
Fri, 14 June 2002 06:22 |
Ecxeleron
Messages: 187 Registered: January 2002 Location: Australia
Karma: 0
|
Senior Member |
|
|
hackie wrote on Wed, 30 January 2002 16:34 |
The Ecxeleron wrote on Wed, 30 January 2002 12:01 AM | I agree, but IE is on 90% of computers, so it's the standard becuse it's used most.
|
heh.. as I said, I disagree, I can't allow one company to control the net, that would be stupid .. and as I said, IE is NOT a standard... HTML/DOM/CSS are, and they should be followed not IE.. MS should be presured into supporting standards NOT the other way arround.
Did ya try latest mozilla? try it, you might like it over IE.. tabbed browsing rocks!
|
Just thought I'll dig up this thread, anywayz, You are right, Why let microsoft controll the net, It's mozilla from now on I'm downloading 1.1 alpha now
|
|
|
Re: better design [message #3232 is a reply to message #3228] |
Fri, 14 June 2002 11:40 |
Olliver
Messages: 443 Registered: March 2002
Karma: 0
|
Senior Member |
|
|
In case u want to install the SUN java 2 package (latest version) Their installer for win32 is a bit stupid because it only recognizes Netscape 6.x and IE 5/6.x but not Mozilla. So u manually have to copy the appropriate plug-in from its installation location to ur plug-in folder. It's easier under *NIX because there u just have to set a symlink
Alternatively u could just stick to the older 1.31 version, which wouldn't have problems with recognizing Moz as a browser.
bye
Ken
[Updated on: Fri, 14 June 2002 11:41] Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|