FUDforum: FUDforum 3.0+ » Where'd the message link go?

Home » FUDforum Development » FUDforum 3.0+ » Where'd the message link go?

Wed, 30 September 2009 02:54

qubodup

Messages: 24
Registered: February 2008

Karma:

Junior Member

Wild_Cat wrote on Thu, 23 July 2009 17:06

Something like [[link-to-self]message #000123[/] is a reply to [link-to-reference-message]message #000456[/]]

I'm currently working on a FUDforum skin and also wanted this functionality, so I implemented it by replacing

{VAR: obj->subject}

with

<a href="{ROOT}?t=msg&amp;{DEF: _rsid}&amp;th={VAR: obj->thread_id}&amp;goto={VAR: obj->id}#msg_{VAR: obj->id}">{VAR: obj->subject}</a>

in drawmsg.tmpl of the template I'm working on. Let me know if you require more detailed instructions to add this functionality. Smile

		Where'd the message link go? By: Wild_Cat on Wed, 22 July 2009 23:05
		Re: Where'd the message link go? By: Wild_Cat on Wed, 22 July 2009 23:13
		Re: Where'd the message link go? By: naudefj on Thu, 23 July 2009 05:56
		Re: Where'd the message link go? By: naudefj on Thu, 23 July 2009 05:58
		Re: Where'd the message link go? By: Wild_Cat on Thu, 23 July 2009 21:22
		Re: Where'd the message link go? By: naudefj on Sat, 25 July 2009 08:52
		Re: Where'd the message link go? By: Wild_Cat on Sat, 25 July 2009 22:38
		Re: Where'd the message link go? By: Wild_Cat on Thu, 23 July 2009 21:06
		Re: Where'd the message link go? By: qubodup on Wed, 30 September 2009 02:54
		Re: Where'd the message link go? By: naudefj on Thu, 01 October 2009 14:06
		Re: Where'd the message link go? By: qubodup on Thu, 01 October 2009 15:12
		Re: Where'd the message link go? By: Wild_Cat on Thu, 01 October 2009 17:01
		Re: Where'd the message link go? By: naudefj on Thu, 01 October 2009 18:30
		Re: Where'd the message link go? By: Wild_Cat on Fri, 02 October 2009 01:44

Previous Topic:	Need Some Fixes, Willing to Pay
Next Topic:	Where is the quoting down for nntp replies?

Goto Forum:

]

Current Time: Sat Nov 30 23:42:39 GMT 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.04565 seconds