FUDforum
Fast Uncompromising Discussions. FUDforum will get your users talking.

Home » Imported messages » comp.lang.php » Iterative interfacing between client and server
Show: Today's Messages :: Polls :: Message Navigator
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: Iterative interfacing between client and server [message #169814 is a reply to message #169807] Mon, 27 September 2010 14:49 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
sheldonlg is currently offline  sheldonlg
Messages: 166
Registered: September 2010
Karma:
Senior Member
On 9/27/2010 9:03 AM, Captain Paralytic wrote:
> On 27 Sep, 03:06, Graham Hobbs<gho...@cdpwise.net> wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Am still new at this, need to understand a concept before I start
>> coding. While the following is an over simplification, at the moment I
>> am more concerned with a) 'can it be done', b) preparing a design
>> document, so ..
>>
>> 1. my website will be driven by server pgm php1
>> 2. client accesses the one page website
>> 3. client enters/edits data in Forms ( to be javascript edited at
>> client machine) then submits
>> 4. pgm php1 receives the form data, passing it to a Windows cmd file
>> (calling dozens of pgms) for further processing and returning data to
>> php1
>> 5. php1 then returns the same page to the client with mostly the same
>> Form data but with additions and changes
>> 6. client views the Form data
>> 7. Repeat 3 thru 7 until client happy with results.
>>
>> So is my concept:
>> - feasible?
>> - reflects the way it's normally done (i.e. practical)?
>>
>> Please, thanks in advance
>> Graham
>
> I'm not sure what you mean by: "to be javascript edited at client
> machine", but in general you are describing a pretty standard
> approach, until you reach the part that says:
> "passing it to a Windows cmd file (calling dozens of pgms) for further
> processing and returning data to php1"
>
> It is more normal to perform one's processing in the programming
> language of the file that receives the form data. Running "dozens of
> [Windoze] programs", sounds like it could be a time consuming task,
> fraught with the possibilities that one of them has an error that you
> somehow have to handle and return to the user. It is occasionally
> necessary to execute a shell program, but most people try to avoid it.

Furthermore you have the question of synchronicity. You have to wait to
get the response back from all of these external processes before
returning to the caller's page. That means you need a way to know when
the external process has completed. In general (with exceptions), it is
a bad idea.

--
Shelly
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: instructor solution manual for Electrical Machines, Drives and Power Systems (6th Ed., Theodore Wildi)
Next Topic: Array count for each value in turn syntax?
Goto Forum:
  

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ]

Current Time: Sun Nov 24 20:32:10 GMT 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.04160 seconds