| Re: I need help for PHP thread code [message #170564 is a reply to message #170559] |
Mon, 08 November 2010 16:10   |
Twayne
Messages: 135
Registered: September 2010
Karma:
|
Senior Member |
|
|
In news:ib8vuh$n28$1(at)news(dot)eternal-september(dot)org,
Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex(at)attglobal(dot)net> typed:
> On 11/8/2010 8:52 AM, sheldonlg wrote:
>> On 11/8/2010 8:35 AM, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
>>> On 11/8/2010 8:16 AM, sheldonlg wrote:
>>>> On 11/8/2010 8:09 AM, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
>>>> > sheldonlg wrote:
>>>> >> On 11/8/2010 3:39 AM, Andreas Otto wrote:
>>>> >>> Hi,
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> I have an library able to create threads by its own
>>>> >>> ... and I want to use this "threads" to run PHP code on it
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> The flow is:
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> 1. start PHP
>>>> >>> 2. external library is listen on socket
>>>> >>> 3. external library create thread on new request
>>>> >>> 4. now PHP should be linked to this new thread
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> currently it is not working ... I use this code...
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> if (create == MQ_FACTORY_NEW_THREAD) {
>>>> >>> // work on NEW thread
>>>> >>> tsrm_set_interpreter_context(tsrm_new_interpreter_context());
>>>> >>> tsrm_ls = (void ***) ts_resource_ex(0, NULL);
>>>> >>> } else {
>>>> >>> // work on an already available thread
>>>> >>> tsrm_ls = (void ***) tmpl->threadData;
>>>> >>> }
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> the problem is that interpreter global's are not
>>>> >>> initialized, example:
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> -> EG(objects_store).object_buckets) = 0x0
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> I need to run some initialization on a new external
>>>> >>> thread Q: is help available?
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> mfg, Andreas Otto
>>>> >>
>>>> >> 1 - Is this supposed to be php?
>>>> >
>>>> > looks like C to me.
>>>>
>>>> That was a sarcastic question. This is a php group.
>>>>
>>>> >
>>>> >> 2 - What are you talking about?
>>>> >>
>>>> >
>>>> > He wants to duplicate the way Apache invokes PHP, I
>>>> > suspect. But using threading rather than forking..
>>>>
>>>> Again, that was a sarcastic question meaning "if you
>>>> want help on something, take the time and trouble to
>>>> explain your problem so that others can readily
>>>> understand what you want". I guess this once again proves SDNWOTN.
>>>> (Sarcasm Does
>>>> Not Work On The Net --- actually made it into the
>>>> dictionary of acronyms).
>>>
>>> Don't worry, Sheldon - it works with intelligent people.
>>
>> Please Jerry, lets not have yet another TNP-Jerry trading
>> insults thread.
>
> It's impossible to insult an idiot, Sheldon. I was just
> pointing out that your sarcasm was not wasted.
You were "just" insultiing a person for no good reason Stukie and you know
it. You're a real wart on the ass of progress for this group.
May you survive a concussion that removes your memory and leaves you
learning disabled.
|
|
|
|
Calendar
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
]