Re: Is there any situation where anything other than require_once is better? [message #171930 is a reply to message #171928] |
Fri, 21 January 2011 17:48 |
Leonardo Azpurua
Messages: 46 Registered: December 2010
Karma:
|
Member |
|
|
"Michael Fesser" <netizen(at)gmx(dot)de> escribió en el mensaje
news:1pfjj654tr4oeo45u6dkhu2lqqbto6r203(at)mfesser(dot)de...
> .oO(Leonardo Azpurua)
>
>> [require vs. require_once]
>>
>> But now I am going to start coding classes, and if they are going to
>> be completely context independent, they must declare their own
>> dependencies as "require" statements.
>>
>> And I guess "require_once" is the natural choice for this situation.
>
> In case of classes there's another very convenient option:
> autoloading.
>
> Have a look at __autoload() or better spl_autoload_register().
Great advice. Thanks!
|
|
|