FUDforum: comp.lang.php

Home » Imported messages » comp.lang.php » php license

Show: Today's Messages :: Polls :: Message Navigator

Re: php license [message #173808 is a reply to message #173804]

Thu, 05 May 2011 19:50

VanguardLH
Messages: 5
Registered: April 2011

Karma:

Junior Member

Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:

> Nonsense. "SLOPHP" would make no difference (as it is a variant of
> "phpfoo", and you can use "PHP" in the product's _name_ if you have
> requested and gotten written permission.

SLOPHP wasn't SLO-PHP. It was meant to represent SLOP-HP, and HP is for
Hewlett's Packard, not PHP. No one can prevent you legally from using a
series of characters in your product name simply because a substring may
match on your product name. WhimsWorder would be a legal product name
despite having msword as a substring.

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		php license By: Aleks Kleyn on Wed, 04 May 2011 02:05
		Re: php license By: P E Schoen on Wed, 04 May 2011 02:42
		Re: php license By: Thomas 'PointedEars' on Wed, 04 May 2011 18:01
		Re: php license By: me on Wed, 04 May 2011 10:42
		Re: php license By: alvaro.NOSPAMTHANX on Wed, 04 May 2011 10:51
		Re: php license By: Aleks Kleyn on Thu, 05 May 2011 00:33
		Re: php license By: alvaro.NOSPAMTHANX on Thu, 05 May 2011 07:56
		Re: php license By: Thomas 'PointedEars' on Thu, 05 May 2011 17:23
		Re: php license By: Thomas 'PointedEars' on Wed, 04 May 2011 15:51
		Re: php license By: VanguardLH on Wed, 04 May 2011 22:14
		Re: php license By: Thomas 'PointedEars' on Thu, 05 May 2011 16:10
		Re: php license By: Thomas 'PointedEars' on Thu, 05 May 2011 19:20
		Re: php license By: VanguardLH on Thu, 05 May 2011 19:50
		Re: php license By: Thomas 'PointedEars' on Thu, 05 May 2011 20:30

Previous Topic:	Memory leak
Next Topic:	How stupid ARE people?

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

]

Current Time: Sat Nov 23 02:45:25 GMT 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.04896 seconds