FUDforum
Fast Uncompromising Discussions. FUDforum will get your users talking.
Home » Imported messages » comp.lang.php » problem saving date fields
Show: Today's Messages :: Polls :: Message Navigator
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: problem saving date fields [message #174116 is a reply to message #174112] Sun, 22 May 2011 12:26 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
Jerry Stuckle is currently offline  Jerry Stuckle
Messages: 2598
Registered: September 2010
Karma:
Senior Member
On 5/22/2011 12:28 AM, Jeff North wrote:
> On Sat, 21 May 2011 20:01:17 -0400, in comp.lang.php Jerry Stuckle
> <jstucklex(at)attglobal(dot)net>
> <ir9jom$663$1(at)dont-email(dot)me> wrote:
>
>> | On 5/21/2011 12:08 PM, Jeff North wrote:
>> |> On Sat, 21 May 2011 10:32:20 -0400, in comp.lang.php Jerry Stuckle
>> |> <jstucklex(at)attglobal(dot)net>
>> |> <ir8idn$ojm$1(at)dont-email(dot)me> wrote:
>> |>
>
> [snip]
>
>> |> There is no need to have variables in the code that aren't being used.
>> |
>> | Yes, there is. In fact, it is quite common to have variables in the
>> | code which are not being use *at this time*. And very good reasons for
>> | *not* initializing them - as a *programmer* would know.
>
> Programmers who know more that just PHP know that you are full of
> crap.
>

I've probably forgotten more languages than you ever learned - starting
with autocoder.

> [snip]
>
>> |>> |> The SQL statement should be ok - it's the "When I change of them the
>> |>> |> other one gets set back to default: 00-00-0000" I'm considering.
>> |>> |
>> |>> | The SQL statement is NOT ok. As he would find if he printed it out as
>> |>> | was suggested.
>> |>
>> |> If the SQL statement was not ok then the record wouldn't be updated.
>> |
>> | Or the row (tables have ROWS, not RECORDS) is not being updated with the
>> | correct data - which is the case here. But then a *programmer* would
>> | understand that.
>
> A row, or record, would NOT be updated if the SQL statement is NOT ok
> - even a moron like you can understand that - oh you do that is why
> you chose to answer the question the way you did.
>

What an idiot. An incorrect SQL statement can cause the row to be
inserted or updated with incorrect data also, as is the case here.

However, it takes intelligence to understand that, which you obviously
do not have.

>> |>> |>> | BTW - your sig separator is broken. It needs to be exactly
>> |>> |>> | hyphen-hyphen-space-newline.
>
> [snip]
>
>> |>> | It has nothing to do with Thunderbird. It has EVERYTHING to do with
>> |>> | following usenet standards, in this case RFC 3736.
>> |>
>> |> Please highlight the line(s) from RFC 3736 that can back up your
>> |> claim.
>> |>
>> |>> | But I see you're as clueless about rfcs as you are programming.
>> |> -- -------------------------------------------------
>> |> The supplied code is for guideline purposes only.
>> |
>> | Typo - the rfc is 3676,
>
> 3676 and 3736 is NOT a typo not matter how you try to spin it. If you
> are going to speak with the voice of authority then get your facts
> correct first.
>

OK, now we know you are a troll and an anal orifice.

>> | which you could find if you knew how to do a
>> | simple google search.
>
> Everyone would know that they needed to search for "The Text/Plain
> Format and DelSp Parameters" to get to the relevant information that
> you got wrong in the first place - right?
>

Ditto.

>> | But that looks to be beyond your capability, also.
>
> http://www.apps.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3676.html#sec-4.3
> "There is a long-standing convention in Usenet news which also
> commonly appears in Internet mail of using "-- " as the separator line
> between the body and the signature of a message. When generating a
> Format=Flowed message containing a Usenet-style separator before the
> signature, the separator line is sent as-is."
>

Which RFC is that?


> Now where does it state "It needs to be exactly
> hyphen-hyphen-space-newline."
>

In the RFC. But you can't read either, so we also know you are an idiot.

> [snip]
> -- -----------------------------------------------------------
> "Pr0r3p"<pr0r3p(at)yahoo(dot)com> wrote:
> I said I was aiming at your stupidity, not your brain.
>
> "Johnny"<wxpprofessional(at)msn(dot)com> writes:
> You missed. You can not hit a non-existent thing.
> -- -----------------------------------------------------------

So, in one post you've proven you are all three. Good job - even
"Pointed Head" hasn't managed that.

--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
JDS Computer Training Corp.
jstucklex(at)attglobal(dot)net
==================

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: is dis da place?
Next Topic: foreach in reverse
Goto Forum:
  

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ]

Current Time: Sun Nov 10 13:14:43 GMT 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.04062 seconds
.:: Contact :: Home ::.

Powered by: FUDforum 3.1.3.
Copyright ©2001-2023 FUDforum Bulletin Board Software