FUDforum
Fast Uncompromising Discussions. FUDforum will get your users talking.

Home » Imported messages » comp.lang.php » problem saving date fields
Show: Today's Messages :: Polls :: Message Navigator
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: problem saving date fields [message #174139 is a reply to message #174125] Sun, 22 May 2011 23:01 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
Jeff North is currently offline  Jeff North
Messages: 58
Registered: November 2010
Karma:
Member
On Sun, 22 May 2011 13:47:29 -0400, in comp.lang.php Jerry Stuckle
<jstucklex(at)attglobal(dot)net>
<irbi7i$gqk$2(at)dont-email(dot)me> wrote:

> | On 5/22/2011 10:08 AM, Jeff North wrote:
> | > On Sun, 22 May 2011 08:26:48 -0400, in comp.lang.php Jerry Stuckle
> | > <jstucklex(at)attglobal(dot)net>
> | > <irave9$qdq$1(at)dont-email(dot)me> wrote:
> | >
> | >> | On 5/22/2011 12:28 AM, Jeff North wrote:
> | >> |> On Sat, 21 May 2011 20:01:17 -0400, in comp.lang.php Jerry Stuckle
> | >> |> <jstucklex(at)attglobal(dot)net>
> | >> |> <ir9jom$663$1(at)dont-email(dot)me> wrote:
> | >
> | > [snip]
> | >
> | >> |> http://www.apps.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3676.html#sec-4.3
> | >> |> "There is a long-standing convention in Usenet news which also
> | >> |> commonly appears in Internet mail of using "-- " as the separator line
> | >> |> between the body and the signature of a message. When generating a
> | >> |> Format=Flowed message containing a Usenet-style separator before the
> | >> |> signature, the separator line is sent as-is."
> | >> |
> | >> | Which RFC is that?
> | >
> | > Have a look at the hyperlink provided but incase you can't read
> | > hyperlinks it is RFC 3676 - the one that YOU provided - remember?
> | >
> | >> |> Now where does it state "It needs to be exactly
> | >> |> hyphen-hyphen-space-newline."
> | >> |
> | >> | In the RFC. But you can't read either, so we also know you are an idiot.
> | >
> | > Which RFC is that - it isn't in the one you provided (3676 or 3736).
> | > Care to provide another RFC?
> |
> | 3767. Learn to read, idiot. But we already know that is beyond your
> | limited capabilities.

First it was 3736, then 3676 and on the third attempt we have 3767!!!

What on earth has "Securely Available Credentials Protocol" got to do
with the signature line format?
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: is dis da place?
Next Topic: foreach in reverse
Goto Forum:
  

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ]

Current Time: Sun Nov 24 21:28:24 GMT 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.06838 seconds