| Re: including CSS & JS on only pages that need that CSS & JS [message #175594 is a reply to message #175591] |
Mon, 10 October 2011 17:44   |
Jerry Stuckle
Messages: 2598
Registered: September 2010
Karma:
|
Senior Member |
|
|
On 10/10/2011 1:04 PM, Michael Joel wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Oct 2011 08:30:15 -0400, Jerry Stuckle
> <jstucklex(at)attglobal(dot)net> wrote:
>
>>> ...............................
>>> On 10/9/2011 6:54 PM, Jerry Stuckle cried from the depths of the abyss:
>
> I had a longer post but didn't want to say more than was needed...
>
> You seem to have a problem with manners. Sorry - I don't want to fight
> but it is usually better not to call people and their advice names. If
> you have better give it, let the OP decide.
>
> I use includes a lot.
> They work. They will work as long as your correct methods work. I use
> file names that make it clear what is in the files.
>
> Mike
You can also arm wrestle a polar bear. It's perfectly legal. But I
wouldn't recommend it.
There are a lot of things that "work". That doesn't mean they are good
things to do - as I pointed out in my first reply to you.
No, I don't have a problem with manners. I do have a problem with
people who suggest crappy code.
And BTW - I use includes a lot, also. But I use them correctly.
--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
JDS Computer Training Corp.
jstucklex(at)attglobal(dot)net
==================
|
|
|
|
Calendar
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
]