FUDforum: comp.lang.php » loose thinking

Home » Imported messages » comp.lang.php » loose thinking

Show: Today's Messages :: Polls :: Message Navigator

Re: loose thinking [message #176794 is a reply to message #176787]

Tue, 24 January 2012 18:43

M. Strobel
Messages: 386
Registered: December 2011

Karma:

Senior Member

Am 24.01.2012 16:20, schrieb "Álvaro G. Vicario":
> El 24/01/2012 14:32, M. Strobel escribió/wrote:
>> Okay I see it is well documented. I just started testing.
>>
>> I am angry about it because not even isset() respects the null value here. I think it
>> makes more sense this way: isset($a[null]) should return false, because there is no
>> null index.
>
> Whatever implementation details are chosen, they need to be coherent.
> I think your proposed behaviour would lead to pretty counter-intuitive situations:
>
> $foo[NULL] = 33;
> if( isset($foo[NULL]) ){
> echo $foo[NULL];
> }else{
> echo '$foo[NULL] is not set'; // Seriously? WTF?
> }
>
>
>> The point is that the designers of PHP (if you can talk about design here) probably
>> meant to help programmers in not making all these hideous type distinctions, but the
>> outcome is you have to be really careful about loose comparison and unwanted type
>> conversion, having to write even more if constructs.
>
> The PHP language has basically evolved along the years as a living creature would do,
> unlike other languages that have actually been designed "on purpose", and it has lots
> of obvious inconsistencies. But you are basically suggesting that there's no place
> for loosely typed languages and I disagree with that. I'm very happy that I don't
> need to write three overloaded versions of the same method just to cope with all the
> expected input data types.
>
> Whatever, if you do web stuff and you prefer strong typing I believe you do have
> quite a choice, from Java to .NET (VisualBasic and C#). Don't stick with PHP if you
> are not going to enjoy its good parts.
>
Enjoy the good parts, but can't avoid the bad parts. Some public wailing will warn
the lurkers.

The Windows stuff is not portable, and system complexity far above unix. Maybe not if
you just click. Programmers don't just click.

/Str.

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		loose thinking By: M. Strobel on Tue, 24 January 2012 10:57
		Re: loose thinking By: alvaro.NOSPAMTHANX on Tue, 24 January 2012 13:04
		Re: loose thinking By: M. Strobel on Tue, 24 January 2012 13:32
		Re: loose thinking By: The Natural Philosoph on Tue, 24 January 2012 13:41
		Re: loose thinking By: Jerry Stuckle on Tue, 24 January 2012 14:35
		Re: loose thinking By: Peter H. Coffin on Tue, 24 January 2012 14:16
		Re: loose thinking By: M. Strobel on Tue, 24 January 2012 16:35
		Re: loose thinking By: The Natural Philosoph on Tue, 24 January 2012 16:59
		Re: loose thinking By: M. Strobel on Tue, 24 January 2012 18:11
		Re: loose thinking By: Thomas 'PointedEars' on Wed, 25 January 2012 03:49
		Re: loose thinking By: Peter H. Coffin on Wed, 25 January 2012 13:58
		Re: loose thinking By: Thomas 'PointedEars' on Wed, 25 January 2012 19:37
		Re: loose thinking By: alvaro.NOSPAMTHANX on Tue, 24 January 2012 15:20
		Re: loose thinking By: The Natural Philosoph on Tue, 24 January 2012 15:43
		Re: loose thinking By: M. Strobel on Tue, 24 January 2012 18:43
		Re: loose thinking By: Arno Welzel on Tue, 24 January 2012 16:02
		Re: loose thinking By: M. Strobel on Tue, 24 January 2012 16:28

Previous Topic:	Open Source Customization
Next Topic:	Product page getting Redirect back to Home page - Please Fix

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

]

Current Time: Wed Nov 27 06:36:17 GMT 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.04576 seconds