FUDforum
Fast Uncompromising Discussions. FUDforum will get your users talking.

Home » Imported messages » comp.lang.php » out of sheer curiosity...
Show: Today's Messages :: Polls :: Message Navigator
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: out of sheer curiosity... [message #177565 is a reply to message #177560] Tue, 10 April 2012 00:22 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
Jerry Stuckle is currently offline  Jerry Stuckle
Messages: 2598
Registered: September 2010
Karma:
Senior Member
On 4/9/2012 5:03 PM, Thomas Mlynarczyk wrote:
> Scott Johnson schrieb:
>
>> What would be the reason to serialize an object other then to save it
>> for later use, and at the time I can't really come up with a reason
>> for that in my mind (lack of experience in this area I suppose)
>
> True, this seems to be the most common use case: Make the object persist
> between different HTTP requests.
>

Objects NEVER persist between different HTTP requests. By definition,
HTTP is a transactional environment and at the end of the request any
objects are destroyed. Data may be saved between requests (i.e.
$_SESSION in PHP, a database, etc.). But these are not objects.

Objects by definition have state and behavior. Only the state can
persist between transactions; behavior never can - which is why objects
need to be reconstructed.

>> Now if you are saving it for later use then the original object would
>> no longer exist and the external resources as Jerry explained would no
>> longer be available if not for the constructor.
>
> The point is that an unserialized object would usually be in a different
> state than a "fresh" object created using the `new` operator and thus
> require different initialization tasks to be performed. That's why
> different magic methods exist:
>

Which is why objects can never persist across transactions. A new
object requires a constructor, under OO rules.

> __construct(): Object is "fresh", created using `new`
> __clone(): Object was copied from another object
> __wakeup(): Object was unserialized
>
> Greetings,
> Thomas
>

Both __construct() and __clone() are types of constructors. __wakeup()
is not (unless you consider sleep() to be a destructor - see above).

--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
JDS Computer Training Corp.
jstucklex(at)attglobal(dot)net
==================
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: 5.4 windows installer.
Next Topic: Does PHP5 treat $_SERVER['PHP_AUTH_USER']) differently?
Goto Forum:
  

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ]

Current Time: Thu Nov 28 08:53:49 GMT 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.05351 seconds