FUDforum: comp.lang.php » out of sheer curiosity...

Home » Imported messages » comp.lang.php » out of sheer curiosity...

Show: Today's Messages :: Polls :: Message Navigator

Re: out of sheer curiosity... [message #177579 is a reply to message #177571]

Tue, 10 April 2012 12:11

Jerry Stuckle
Messages: 2598
Registered: September 2010

Karma:

Senior Member

On 4/10/2012 6:43 AM, Thomas Mlynarczyk wrote:
> Jerry Stuckle schrieb:
>
>> Objects NEVER persist between different HTTP requests. By definition,
>> HTTP is a transactional environment and at the end of the request any
>> objects are destroyed.
>
> True. But since we do need objects to persist, we invent things like
> sessions and serialization so our scripts can *pretend* they persist and
> will never know the difference.
>
>> Objects by definition have state and behavior. Only the state can
>> persist between transactions; behavior never can - which is why
>> objects need to be reconstructed.
>
> Behaviour is "the methods". And they surely persist since the source
> files are not destroyed after each request. All instances of a class
> share the same methods, after all.
>

No, you cannot use those methods to act on the data while it is
serialized, i.e. on disk or in a database. Only the state is present.

To use those methods, you need to create a new object using that state
data.

It is a huge difference which true OO languages handle just fine. Only
PHP seems to have a problem with it.

>> Both __construct() and __clone() are types of constructors. __wakeup()
>> is not (unless you consider sleep() to be a destructor - see above).
>
> Why do you keep insisting that I must consider __sleep() to be a
> destructor if I consider __wakeup() to be a constructor?
>
> Consider:
>
> 1) __sleep() is called before the corresponding __wakeup() -- by your
> logic this would mean the destructor is called before the constructor
>
> 2) __sleep() is called on a different object than the corresponding
> __wakeup() -- so it cannot be the destructor corresponding to __wakeup()
>
> 3) __sleep() does not destroy anything. On the contrary, it helps to
> preserve something. It is therefore not a destructor.
>
> Greetings,
> Thomas
>

If you are considering __wakeup() to be a constructor, then __sleep(),
being exactly the opposite, would be a destructor. (why do you think
they are called "sleep" and "wakeup" if the designers didn't consider
them to be opposites?).

And what you're saying is that the destructor (__sleep()) is called
after a constructor (__construct(), __clone() or __wakeup()).

--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
JDS Computer Training Corp.
jstucklex(at)attglobal(dot)net
==================

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		out of sheer curiosity... By: Leonardo Azpurua on Tue, 27 March 2012 17:01
		Re: out of sheer curiosity... By: alvaro.NOSPAMTHANX on Tue, 27 March 2012 17:06
		Re: out of sheer curiosity... By: Leonardo Azpurua on Tue, 27 March 2012 17:34
		Re: out of sheer curiosity... By: Thomas 'PointedEars' on Wed, 28 March 2012 19:12
		Re: out of sheer curiosity... By: Leonardo Azpurua on Thu, 29 March 2012 00:53
		Re: out of sheer curiosity... By: M. Strobel on Thu, 29 March 2012 08:00
		Re: out of sheer curiosity... By: Leonardo Azpurua on Thu, 29 March 2012 09:53
		Re: out of sheer curiosity... By: The Natural Philosoph on Thu, 29 March 2012 10:46
		Re: out of sheer curiosity... By: M. Strobel on Thu, 29 March 2012 12:02
		Re: out of sheer curiosity... By: Erwin Moller on Thu, 29 March 2012 12:33
		Re: out of sheer curiosity... By: The Natural Philosoph on Thu, 29 March 2012 13:37
		Re: out of sheer curiosity... By: Erwin Moller on Thu, 29 March 2012 13:59
		Re: out of sheer curiosity... By: The Natural Philosoph on Thu, 29 March 2012 16:58
		Re: out of sheer curiosity... By: Jerry Stuckle on Thu, 29 March 2012 13:39
		Re: out of sheer curiosity... By: Erwin Moller on Thu, 29 March 2012 14:21
		Re: out of sheer curiosity... By: The Natural Philosoph on Thu, 29 March 2012 17:09
		Re: out of sheer curiosity... By: Tim Streater on Thu, 29 March 2012 21:07
		Re: out of sheer curiosity... By: M. Strobel on Thu, 29 March 2012 21:43
		Re: out of sheer curiosity... By: The Natural Philosoph on Fri, 30 March 2012 03:52
		Re: out of sheer curiosity... By: Jerry Stuckle on Thu, 29 March 2012 20:11
		Re: out of sheer curiosity... By: Tim Streater on Thu, 29 March 2012 21:01
		Re: out of sheer curiosity... By: Jerry Stuckle on Thu, 29 March 2012 23:29
		Re: out of sheer curiosity... By: M. Strobel on Sun, 08 April 2012 20:50
		Re: out of sheer curiosity... By: Jerry Stuckle on Sun, 08 April 2012 21:15
		Re: out of sheer curiosity... By: M. Strobel on Sun, 08 April 2012 22:39
		Re: out of sheer curiosity... By: The Natural Philosoph on Sun, 08 April 2012 23:59
		Re: out of sheer curiosity... By: Jerry Stuckle on Mon, 09 April 2012 00:28
		Re: out of sheer curiosity... By: Jerry Stuckle on Mon, 09 April 2012 00:24
		Re: out of sheer curiosity... By: M. Strobel on Mon, 09 April 2012 09:29
		Re: out of sheer curiosity... By: Jerry Stuckle on Mon, 09 April 2012 12:27
		Re: out of sheer curiosity... By: Thomas Mlynarczyk on Mon, 09 April 2012 13:20
		Re: out of sheer curiosity... By: Jerry Stuckle on Mon, 09 April 2012 16:03
		Re: out of sheer curiosity... By: Thomas Mlynarczyk on Mon, 09 April 2012 18:04
		Re: out of sheer curiosity... By: Jerry Stuckle on Mon, 09 April 2012 18:37
		Re: out of sheer curiosity... By: Thomas Mlynarczyk on Mon, 09 April 2012 20:50
		Re: out of sheer curiosity... By: Jerry Stuckle on Tue, 10 April 2012 00:17
		Re: out of sheer curiosity... By: M. Strobel on Tue, 10 April 2012 08:05
		Re: out of sheer curiosity... By: Thomas Mlynarczyk on Tue, 10 April 2012 11:28
		Re: out of sheer curiosity... By: M. Strobel on Tue, 10 April 2012 16:54
		Re: out of sheer curiosity... By: Thomas Mlynarczyk on Tue, 10 April 2012 18:10
		Re: out of sheer curiosity... By: M. Strobel on Tue, 10 April 2012 18:23
		Re: out of sheer curiosity... By: Thomas Mlynarczyk on Tue, 10 April 2012 21:17
		Re: out of sheer curiosity... By: Jerry Stuckle on Tue, 10 April 2012 21:11
		Re: out of sheer curiosity... By: Thomas Mlynarczyk on Tue, 10 April 2012 21:30
		Re: out of sheer curiosity... By: Jerry Stuckle on Tue, 10 April 2012 23:43
		Re: out of sheer curiosity... By: Jerry Stuckle on Tue, 10 April 2012 21:08
		Re: out of sheer curiosity... By: M. Strobel on Wed, 11 April 2012 08:40
		Re: out of sheer curiosity... By: Jerry Stuckle on Tue, 10 April 2012 11:58
		Re: out of sheer curiosity... By: Tim Streater on Tue, 10 April 2012 15:04
		Re: out of sheer curiosity... By: Jerry Stuckle on Tue, 10 April 2012 16:10
		Re: out of sheer curiosity... By: Thomas Mlynarczyk on Tue, 10 April 2012 16:18
		Re: out of sheer curiosity... By: The Natural Philosoph on Tue, 10 April 2012 17:20
		Re: out of sheer curiosity... By: M. Strobel on Tue, 10 April 2012 17:31
		Re: out of sheer curiosity... By: Jerry Stuckle on Tue, 10 April 2012 21:20
		Re: out of sheer curiosity... By: Thomas Mlynarczyk on Tue, 10 April 2012 21:57
		Re: out of sheer curiosity... By: Jerry Stuckle on Tue, 10 April 2012 23:50
		Re: out of sheer curiosity... By: Tim Streater on Tue, 10 April 2012 16:41
		Re: out of sheer curiosity... By: Thomas Mlynarczyk on Tue, 10 April 2012 15:25
		Re: out of sheer curiosity... By: Jerry Stuckle on Tue, 10 April 2012 16:16
		Re: out of sheer curiosity... By: Thomas Mlynarczyk on Tue, 10 April 2012 11:44
		Re: out of sheer curiosity... By: Jerry Stuckle on Tue, 10 April 2012 12:04
		Re: out of sheer curiosity... By: Thomas Mlynarczyk on Tue, 10 April 2012 15:37
		Re: out of sheer curiosity... By: Jerry Stuckle on Tue, 10 April 2012 16:19
		Re: out of sheer curiosity... By: Thomas Mlynarczyk on Tue, 10 April 2012 16:44
		Re: out of sheer curiosity... By: Jerry Stuckle on Tue, 10 April 2012 21:23
		Re: out of sheer curiosity... By: Scott Johnson on Mon, 09 April 2012 18:50
		Re: out of sheer curiosity... By: Thomas Mlynarczyk on Mon, 09 April 2012 21:03
		Re: out of sheer curiosity... By: Scott Johnson on Mon, 09 April 2012 22:27
		Re: out of sheer curiosity... By: Jerry Stuckle on Tue, 10 April 2012 00:25
		Re: out of sheer curiosity... By: Thomas Mlynarczyk on Tue, 10 April 2012 10:48
		Re: out of sheer curiosity... By: Jerry Stuckle on Tue, 10 April 2012 12:06
		Re: out of sheer curiosity... By: Leonardo Azpurua on Tue, 10 April 2012 12:22
		Re: out of sheer curiosity... By: Jerry Stuckle on Tue, 10 April 2012 16:20
		Re: out of sheer curiosity... By: Leonardo Azpurua on Tue, 10 April 2012 16:33
		Re: out of sheer curiosity... By: Jerry Stuckle on Tue, 10 April 2012 21:28
		Re: out of sheer curiosity... By: Thomas Mlynarczyk on Tue, 10 April 2012 22:13
		Re: out of sheer curiosity... By: Jerry Stuckle on Tue, 10 April 2012 23:53
		Re: out of sheer curiosity... By: Thomas Mlynarczyk on Wed, 11 April 2012 20:17
		Re: out of sheer curiosity... By: Jerry Stuckle on Wed, 11 April 2012 20:30
		Re: out of sheer curiosity... By: Jerry Stuckle on Tue, 10 April 2012 00:22
		Re: out of sheer curiosity... By: Thomas Mlynarczyk on Tue, 10 April 2012 10:43
		Re: out of sheer curiosity... By: Jerry Stuckle on Tue, 10 April 2012 12:11
		Re: out of sheer curiosity... By: Thomas Mlynarczyk on Tue, 10 April 2012 16:15
		Re: out of sheer curiosity... By: M. Strobel on Tue, 10 April 2012 17:09
		Re: out of sheer curiosity... By: Thomas Mlynarczyk on Tue, 10 April 2012 18:17
		Re: out of sheer curiosity... By: M. Strobel on Tue, 10 April 2012 18:25
		Re: out of sheer curiosity... By: Thomas Mlynarczyk on Tue, 10 April 2012 21:21
		Re: out of sheer curiosity... By: Jerry Stuckle on Tue, 10 April 2012 21:34
		Re: out of sheer curiosity... By: Thomas Mlynarczyk on Tue, 10 April 2012 23:00
		Re: out of sheer curiosity... By: Jerry Stuckle on Tue, 10 April 2012 23:54
		Re: out of sheer curiosity... By: Thomas Mlynarczyk on Wed, 11 April 2012 20:10
		Re: out of sheer curiosity... By: Jerry Stuckle on Wed, 11 April 2012 20:31
		Re: out of sheer curiosity... By: Thomas Mlynarczyk on Wed, 11 April 2012 20:40
		Re: out of sheer curiosity... By: Jerry Stuckle on Thu, 12 April 2012 04:02
		Re: out of sheer curiosity... By: M. Strobel on Thu, 12 April 2012 10:00
		Re: out of sheer curiosity... By: Jerry Stuckle on Thu, 12 April 2012 11:45

Previous Topic:	5.4 windows installer.
Next Topic:	Does PHP5 treat $_SERVER['PHP_AUTH_USER']) differently?

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

]

Current Time: Thu Nov 28 10:41:22 GMT 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.04542 seconds