Re: Windows binaries 64bit for PHP [message #177994] |
Wed, 09 May 2012 22:28 |
Daniel Pitts
Messages: 68 Registered: May 2012
Karma: 0
|
Member |
|
|
On 5/9/12 3:19 PM, Michael Fesser wrote:
> .oO(Jerry Stuckle)
>
>> On 5/8/2012 4:25 PM, Michael Fesser wrote:
>>> .oO(Jerry Stuckle)
>>>
>>>> On 5/7/2012 11:37 PM, Daniel Pitts wrote:
>>>> > Exactly true, but if you scale to sizes you don't need, you indeed use
>>>> > more processor time! Our disk space is definitely not the bottleneck.
>>>>
>>>> And if you repeatedly rescale the same image to the same size, you're
>>>> using even more processor time!
>>>
>>> You missed the word 'caching'. You rescale when needed, and only once.
>>
>> No, I didn't. By definition, caching is temporary storage which can be
>> erased at any time.
>
> Correct. And then the rescaled images are created again when needed, so
> what's the problem? It all happens automatically.
>
> Micha
>
Caching needn't be temporary, and you can ensure it isn't "erased at any
time" by just not erasing the "cache". There are many different types
of "cache".
|
|
|