FUDforum
Fast Uncompromising Discussions. FUDforum will get your users talking.

Home » Imported messages » comp.lang.php » Bad database design can cause unnecessary coding
Show: Today's Messages :: Polls :: Message Navigator
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: Bad database design can cause unnecessary coding [message #179519 is a reply to message #179510] Sun, 04 November 2012 10:04 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
Tony Marston is currently offline  Tony Marston
Messages: 57
Registered: November 2010
Karma:
Member
"Denis McMahon" wrote in message news:k734vv$so2$1(at)dont-email(dot)me...
>
> On Sat, 03 Nov 2012 09:31:15 +0000, Tony Marston wrote:
>
>> "Denis McMahon" wrote in message news:k709tb$h2i$1(at)dont-email(dot)me...
>>>
>>> On Fri, 02 Nov 2012 07:12:05 +0000, Tony Marston wrote:
>>>
>>>> Do you agree with my opinions? Can you think of any more questionable
>>>> design decisions which can be added to this list?
>>>
>>> I think that, not only are you a spammer, but you're a crap one. My
>>> first reaction on actually reading the url you posted was "wtf, this
>>> jerk can't even write english!"
>>>
>>> The first design paradigm I have for you as a website designer is "Don't
>>> try and write websites in languages you aren't fluent in!"
>
>> What is wrong with my english? Why do you think I am not fluent in PHP?
>> Or are you another one of these trolls who is incapable of responding
>> properly to a serious article?
>
> I find it hard to take an article seriously when it contains so many
> errors. In addition, you appear to be spamming. My grandmother used to
> say "if it waddles like a duck and it quacks like a duck, it's a duck."
>
> However, I'll give you the benefit of the doubt, here's one example:
>
> "There are some people out there who are design but never build."

So you found a single little mistake which both I and my spellchecker
missed, and that cause you to disregard the whole article. How petty you
are!

> Now, turning to the technical content of your page, your first rule is:
>
> 'Every table requires a primary key. Some databases allow a table to be
> created without a primary key, but there is no good reason to use this
> "feature".'
>
> Pray tell me, in a database table that maps attendees to events in a many
> to many relationship, which column, attendee_id or event_id, would be the
> primary key?

If you bothered to read the article you would have come across this:
http://www.tonymarston.net/php-mysql/database-design-ru-novice-ninja-or-nin compoop.html#many-to-many

> Or should I add a third, unused, autoincrement column called mapping_id
> just so that I can have a primary key, even though that value is never
> going to be used.
>
> In addition, you state that 'Wherever possible fields with the same
> content should have the same name.'
>
> I have, in my 20+ years of working with sql, found that it is much more
> beneficial to name columns for their purpose within the table, rather
> than their purpose within some other table.
>
> e.g. person_id in the person table may map to manager_id or managee_id in
> the manager table (which maps managers to their staff), attendee_id in
> the mapping of events to attendees, and trainee_id in the mapping of
> people to courses they have attended (and all three of those tables break
> your first rule, because they are all many to many mappings).

While that may be OK sometimes, the point I was trying to make was that you
should avoid have different names such as ACCOUNT_NO, ACCNO and ACC_NUM
which mean the same thing. You should also avoid using a name which has
different meanings on different tables.

> My final word is this. Your cardinal rule, rule 1, implies that you have

So you disagree with the cardinal rule which says that every table should
have a primary key? That says a lot about your capabilities. I would hate to
work on a database that *YOU* designed.

> no understanding of the use, purpose or benefit of mapping many to many
> relationships. If that is the case, then your claimed years of experience
> are worth squat, zero, zilch, sweet fuck all. If that is not the case,
> then your ability to develop worthwhile, meaningful database design
> paradigms based on your claimed years of experience is worth squat, zero,
> zilch, sweet fuck all.
>
> gds
>
> Denis McMahon

--
Tony Marston

http://www.tonymarston.net
http://www.radicore.org
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: php daemon
Next Topic: keeping the page content stay in their positions and not merging
Goto Forum:
  

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ]

Current Time: Sun Dec 01 00:19:50 GMT 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.04293 seconds