Re: Information Theoretically Secure requirements scheme for improving and implementing intelligent encryption requiring human intervention or decision to be valid. [message #180197 is a reply to message #180196] |
Thu, 24 January 2013 20:18 data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/de604/de60476774e658f41e61975fd5c385f5b5c421fb" alt="Go to previous message Go to previous message" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9093c/9093cca2451296be3fa41df0505dc512aa31ddb3" alt="Go to next message Go to previous message" |
Jerry Stuckle
Messages: 2598 Registered: September 2010
Karma:
|
Senior Member |
|
|
On 1/24/2013 12:27 PM, unruh wrote:
> On 2013-01-24, Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex(at)attglobal(dot)net> wrote:
>> On 1/24/2013 12:10 AM, Martin Musatov wrote:
>>>
>>> The techniques all listed above and the intellectual property rights
>>> associated with them are (C) Copyright 2013 Martin Musatov. They may
>>> be used or adapted by any entity provided partial credit is provided
>>> to Martin Musatov and is documented as well as when this occurs in
>>> conjunction with a non-public donation to a charity equal to the value
>>> of the contribution.
>>>
>>
>> And not worth the bandwidth they took to process.
>>
>> BTW - you can copyright text (including code), but you cannot copyright
>> a concept. If your concept were worth anything, anyone could use it at
>> any time without any credit to you or any payment to anyone.
>>
>> If you want to protect a concept you need to patent it.
>
> Except you cannot patent concepts either. You can patent things or
> processes or designs, but not concepts or ideas.
> And you cannot copyright "intellectual property". The category
> "intellectual property" refers to things which a copyrightable,
> patentable or trademarkable. It is not a category which has any
> independent definition beyond the definition of those categories.
> It is an entirely artificial concept with the word "property" used in a
> purely mataphoric sense.
>>
In the United States you can, anyway. I don't know about the rest of
the world.
Many computer algorithms are patented. For instance, the RSA algorithm
is U.S. Patent 4,405,829. I don't see that as any different than what
the op is proposing.
--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
JDS Computer Training Corp.
jstucklex(at)attglobal(dot)net
==================
|
|
|