FUDforum: comp.lang.php » bug in is

Home » Imported messages » comp.lang.php » bug in is_numeric

Show: Today's Messages :: Polls :: Message Navigator

Re: bug in is_numeric [message #181445 is a reply to message #181413]

Thu, 16 May 2013 22:16

SwissCheese
Messages: 17
Registered: December 2012

Karma:

Junior Member

On 05/15/2013 02:49 PM, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
> Christoph Becker wrote:
>
>> Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
>>> SwissCheese wrote:
>>>> norman@amd64x2:~$ php -a
>>>> Interactive shell
>>>>
>>>> php > $a = 'x';
>>>> php > if(is_numeric($a)) { echo 'okay'; } else { echo 'not okay'; }
>>>> not okay
>>>> php > $a = '11';
>>>> php > if(is_numeric($a)) { echo 'okay'; } else { echo 'not okay'; }
>>>> okay
>>>> php > $a = 'x11.11c';
>>>> php > if(is_numeric($a)) { echo 'okay'; } else { echo 'not okay'; }
>>>> not okay
>>>> php > $a = '0x1111c';
>>>> php > if(is_numeric($a)) { echo 'okay'; } else { echo 'not okay'; }
>>>> okay
>>>>
>>>> As per http://us3.php.net/manual/en/function.is-numeric.php :
>>>>
>>>> "Hexadecimal (e.g. 0xf4c3b00c), Binary (e.g. 0b10100111001), Octal (e.g.
>>>> 0777) notation is allowed too but only without sign, decimal and
>>>> exponential part."
>>>
>>> But AISB, the implementation is contradicting the documentation (or vice-
>>> versa) because the a string argument containing the binary format causes
>>> is_numeric() to return FALSE in PHP 5.4.4 and PHP 5.4.14 (when according
>
> 5.4.15(-1; Debian), not .14
>
>>> to the above it should have returned TRUE).
>>
>> I can confirm issues with is_numeric() wrt. strings in binary notation
>> in PHP 5.4.7:
>>
>>>> > is_numeric('0b1010')
>> false
>>>> > is_numeric(0b1010)
>> true
>
> ACK. However, it is unsurprising to me that the latter would return TRUE
> because there the literal is parsed into an “int” value *before* it is
> passed to is_numeric(), the equivalent of is_numeric(10).
>
> I would rather the former bug was an implementation bug instead of a
> documentation bug, because such a function should either work for all
> supported numeric representations of the programming language, or there
> should be a parameter specifying which representations are supported for the
> specific call [like ECMAScripts parseInt(number : String, base : Number) :
> Number].
>
>
> PointedEars
>

Thomas,

Looking into the source (PHP) there is no code to support binary
strings of the type '0b1010101'. The code for hexadecimal is there however.

php > $tests =
array("42",1337,"0xf4c3b00c","x11.11c","0x11.11c","0x1111c","0b1010 ","0b10101",
" 101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101 01010101010 ",
"0700");
php > foreach ($tests as $a) { if(is_numeric($a)) { echo "$a is numeric
".var_dump(is_numeric($a)).PHP_EOL; } else { echo "$a is not
numeric".var_dump(is_numeric($a)).PHP_EOL; } }
bool(true)
42 is numeric
bool(true)
1337 is numeric
bool(true)
0xf4c3b00c is numeric
bool(false)
x11.11c is not numeric
bool(false)
0x11.11c is not numeric
bool(true)
0x1111c is numeric
bool(false)
0b1010 is not numeric
bool(false)
0b10101 is not numeric
bool(true)
101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101010101 01010101010
is numeric
bool(true)
0700 is numeric

--
Norman
Registered Linux user #461062
-Have you been to www.php.net yet?-

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		bug in is_numeric By: fred on Sun, 12 May 2013 14:22
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Salvatore on Sun, 12 May 2013 15:31
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Luuk on Sun, 12 May 2013 15:55
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Luuk on Sun, 12 May 2013 15:58
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Thomas Mlynarczyk on Sun, 12 May 2013 16:06
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Denis McMahon on Sun, 12 May 2013 16:24
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: fred on Sun, 12 May 2013 17:41
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Erwin Moller on Mon, 13 May 2013 11:50
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: fred on Mon, 13 May 2013 13:58
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Jerry Stuckle on Mon, 13 May 2013 14:11
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: fred on Mon, 13 May 2013 14:15
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Erwin Moller on Mon, 13 May 2013 15:29
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: J.O. Aho on Mon, 13 May 2013 17:55
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Richard Yates on Tue, 14 May 2013 13:41
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: SwissCheese on Wed, 15 May 2013 01:43
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Jerry Stuckle on Wed, 15 May 2013 03:01
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: SwissCheese on Wed, 15 May 2013 09:48
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Jerry Stuckle on Wed, 15 May 2013 10:11
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: SwissCheese on Thu, 16 May 2013 22:36
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Thomas 'PointedEars' on Wed, 15 May 2013 13:19
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Christoph Becker on Wed, 15 May 2013 18:23
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Thomas 'PointedEars' on Wed, 15 May 2013 18:49
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Christoph Becker on Wed, 15 May 2013 19:58
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Thomas 'PointedEars' on Wed, 15 May 2013 20:20
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Christoph Becker on Wed, 15 May 2013 20:42
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Thomas Mlynarczyk on Wed, 15 May 2013 21:53
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Christoph Becker on Wed, 15 May 2013 22:29
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Christoph Becker on Wed, 15 May 2013 22:40
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Thomas 'PointedEars' on Thu, 16 May 2013 03:00
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: SwissCheese on Thu, 16 May 2013 22:16
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Thomas 'PointedEars' on Thu, 16 May 2013 22:45
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: SwissCheese on Fri, 17 May 2013 02:52
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Thomas 'PointedEars' on Fri, 17 May 2013 16:33
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Christoph Becker on Fri, 17 May 2013 18:39
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Thomas 'PointedEars' on Fri, 17 May 2013 21:45
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Christoph Becker on Sat, 18 May 2013 12:47
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: SwissCheese on Thu, 16 May 2013 00:57
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Jerry Stuckle on Thu, 16 May 2013 04:09
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Christoph Becker on Thu, 16 May 2013 23:17
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Jerry Stuckle on Fri, 17 May 2013 00:30
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Christoph Becker on Sat, 18 May 2013 12:51
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Jerry Stuckle on Sat, 18 May 2013 14:07
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Sanders Kaufman on Sat, 18 May 2013 16:56
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Jerry Stuckle on Sat, 18 May 2013 18:32
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Thomas 'PointedEars' on Sat, 18 May 2013 20:24
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Jerry Stuckle on Sat, 18 May 2013 21:01
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Denis McMahon on Sat, 18 May 2013 21:58
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Jerry Stuckle on Sat, 18 May 2013 23:21
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Denis McMahon on Sun, 19 May 2013 02:22
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Jerry Stuckle on Sun, 19 May 2013 02:41
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Sanders Kaufman on Sun, 19 May 2013 10:28
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Jerry Stuckle on Sun, 19 May 2013 13:42
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Sanders Kaufman on Sun, 19 May 2013 16:42
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Jerry Stuckle on Sun, 19 May 2013 18:39
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Sanders Kaufman on Tue, 21 May 2013 06:01
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Jerry Stuckle on Tue, 21 May 2013 09:59
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: The Natural Philosoph on Sun, 19 May 2013 06:49
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Sanders Kaufman on Sun, 19 May 2013 10:31
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: The Natural Philosoph on Sun, 19 May 2013 11:39
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Jerry Stuckle on Sun, 19 May 2013 13:43
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Sanders Kaufman on Sun, 19 May 2013 16:52
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Jerry Stuckle on Sun, 19 May 2013 18:42
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Sanders Kaufman on Tue, 21 May 2013 06:03
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Jerry Stuckle on Tue, 21 May 2013 10:00
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Sanders Kaufman on Sun, 19 May 2013 16:45
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Sanders Kaufman on Sun, 19 May 2013 10:27
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Jerry Stuckle on Sun, 19 May 2013 13:45
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Sanders Kaufman on Sun, 19 May 2013 16:37
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Jerry Stuckle on Sun, 19 May 2013 18:43
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Sanders Kaufman on Tue, 21 May 2013 05:59
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Jerry Stuckle on Tue, 21 May 2013 10:02
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Sanders Kaufman on Sat, 18 May 2013 22:08
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: The Natural Philosoph on Sat, 18 May 2013 22:58
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Jerry Stuckle on Sat, 18 May 2013 23:22
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Sanders Kaufman on Sat, 18 May 2013 22:11
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Jerry Stuckle on Sat, 18 May 2013 23:23
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Sanders Kaufman on Sun, 19 May 2013 10:35
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Jerry Stuckle on Sun, 19 May 2013 13:46
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Sanders Kaufman on Sun, 19 May 2013 16:23
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Jerry Stuckle on Sun, 19 May 2013 18:44
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Sanders Kaufman on Tue, 21 May 2013 05:54
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Jerry Stuckle on Tue, 21 May 2013 10:03
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: fred on Thu, 23 May 2013 14:38
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Arno Welzel on Sat, 01 June 2013 15:36
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Jerry Stuckle on Sat, 01 June 2013 18:54
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Arno Welzel on Wed, 05 June 2013 13:25
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Jerry Stuckle on Wed, 05 June 2013 14:34
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Arno Welzel on Wed, 05 June 2013 15:02
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Jerry Stuckle on Wed, 05 June 2013 16:30
		OT: What you say is not always what you mean (was: Re: bug in is_numeric) By: Arno Welzel on Wed, 05 June 2013 18:20
		Re: OT: What you say is not always what you mean By: Jerry Stuckle on Wed, 05 June 2013 18:40
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Thomas 'PointedEars' on Sat, 18 May 2013 19:51
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Sanders Kaufman on Sat, 18 May 2013 22:13
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Thomas 'PointedEars' on Sat, 18 May 2013 22:49
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Sanders Kaufman on Sun, 19 May 2013 10:24
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Thomas 'PointedEars' on Sun, 19 May 2013 10:40
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: The Natural Philosoph on Sun, 19 May 2013 11:43
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Sanders Kaufman on Sun, 19 May 2013 16:29
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Norman Peelman on Sat, 18 May 2013 18:53
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: SwissCheese on Thu, 16 May 2013 22:41
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Daniel Pitts on Mon, 13 May 2013 15:35
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Denis McMahon on Mon, 13 May 2013 20:26
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Denis McMahon on Mon, 13 May 2013 20:15
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Robert Heller on Sun, 12 May 2013 18:03
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Thomas 'PointedEars' on Sun, 12 May 2013 16:03
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: fred on Sun, 12 May 2013 17:34
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Thomas 'PointedEars' on Sun, 12 May 2013 17:40
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Luuk on Sun, 12 May 2013 19:51
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Sanders Kaufman on Sun, 12 May 2013 16:47
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Luuk on Sun, 12 May 2013 16:56
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Thomas Mlynarczyk on Sun, 12 May 2013 17:05
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Thomas 'PointedEars' on Sun, 12 May 2013 17:38
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Thomas 'PointedEars' on Sun, 12 May 2013 17:46
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Jerry Stuckle on Sun, 12 May 2013 18:11
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Thomas 'PointedEars' on Sun, 12 May 2013 18:39
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Jerry Stuckle on Sun, 12 May 2013 20:51
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Thomas 'PointedEars' on Sun, 12 May 2013 23:27
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Jerry Stuckle on Mon, 13 May 2013 00:35
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Thomas 'PointedEars' on Mon, 13 May 2013 09:07
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Jerry Stuckle on Mon, 13 May 2013 13:02
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Thomas 'PointedEars' on Mon, 13 May 2013 14:57
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Thomas 'PointedEars' on Mon, 13 May 2013 15:10
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Jerry Stuckle on Mon, 13 May 2013 17:52
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Thomas 'PointedEars' on Mon, 13 May 2013 18:28
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: SwissCheese on Thu, 16 May 2013 22:28
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Thomas 'PointedEars' on Thu, 16 May 2013 22:33
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: SwissCheese on Fri, 17 May 2013 02:34
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Thomas 'PointedEars' on Sat, 18 May 2013 08:28
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Norman Peelman on Sat, 18 May 2013 12:00
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Luuk on Sat, 18 May 2013 12:18
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Tim Streater on Sat, 18 May 2013 12:20
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Jerry Stuckle on Sat, 18 May 2013 12:47
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: The Natural Philosoph on Sat, 18 May 2013 13:05
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Jerry Stuckle on Sat, 18 May 2013 14:16
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Thomas 'PointedEars' on Sat, 18 May 2013 14:14
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Sandman on Tue, 14 May 2013 08:34
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: fred on Tue, 14 May 2013 13:47
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Denis McMahon on Tue, 14 May 2013 14:54
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Sandman on Wed, 15 May 2013 06:05
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Jerry Stuckle on Wed, 15 May 2013 10:27
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Erwin Moller on Wed, 15 May 2013 11:11

Previous Topic:	problem encrypting data (AES_ENCRYPT/AES_DECRYPT)
Next Topic:	Debian: php fast-cgi along with mod_php

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

]

Current Time: Wed Nov 27 01:50:59 GMT 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.05304 seconds