FUDforum
Fast Uncompromising Discussions. FUDforum will get your users talking.

Home » Imported messages » comp.lang.php » Compiling PHP 5.x on Cygwin
Show: Today's Messages :: Polls :: Message Navigator
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: Compiling PHP 5.x on Cygwin [message #182642 is a reply to message #182637] Tue, 20 August 2013 20:48 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
Jerry Stuckle is currently offline  Jerry Stuckle
Messages: 2598
Registered: September 2010
Karma:
Senior Member
On 8/20/2013 2:20 PM, Christoph Michael Becker wrote:
> Jerry Stuckle wrote:
>
>> On 8/16/2013 6:16 PM, Christoph Michael Becker wrote:
>>> I have tried to compile PHP 5.5.1 and 5.5.2 on Cygwin[1], but the
>>> default ./configure fails with:
>>>
>>> | checking for known struct flock definition... configure: error: Don't
>>> | know how to define struct flock on this system, set
>>> | --enable-opcache=no
>>>
>>> If I do "./config --enable-opcache=no" I'm able to build PHP, but I'd
>>> rather build it with the opcache enabled. Any hints on how to
>>> accomplish this are appreciated.
>>>
>>> [1] $ uname -a
>>> CYGWIN_NT-5.1 RELIANT 1.7.18(0.263/5/3) 2013-04-19 10:39 i686 Cygwin
>>>
>>
>> I suspect it's looking for struct flock in .../include/sys/fcntl.h.
>> However, IIRC, in cygwin the definition is located in
>> .../cygwin/include/cygwin/types.h. But beware - the last I looked,
>> flock was still buggy in cygwin.
>>
>> I don't use cygwin here any more, so I can't test. However, I suspect
>> you're going to have to modify your config file or, at the very least,
>> force an include of the cygwin version of the file. You may also have
>> to look into the header to see if you need a #define to get the struct
>> included.
>
> Thanks, Jerry, that brought me a bit further. Indeed including
> <cygwin/types.h> in the config file made the general check for flock
> happy; the second check for the opcache additionally needed a ||
> defined(__CYGWIN32__) to an #elif. After these modifications building
> was possible; however, I was not able to actually activate the opcache.
>
> The problem seems to be that PHP is building shared libraries with a .so
> extension on Cygwin, where this should be .dll.a. This also happens
> with the original ./configure and --enable-opcache=no. This is no
> problem for the PHP executable, which statically links in the default
> extensions, but not the opcache extension.

Can you rename the libraries? Or maybe change the config script to
generate the proper names? (I don't know - it's been too long since I
used cygwin - and then not with PHP).

>
> Running "make test" produced failures for all tests, which might be
> related to the shared library issue. It seems to me PHP's Cygwin
> support has some flaws. I'm considering to file a bug report/feature
> request to improve that, even if I understand that supporting Cygwin has
> probably low priority for the PHP developers.
>

I doubt you'll get any help. Is there a version of PHP in the cygwin
libraries (I don't know - it's been too long since I used cygwin, but
IIRC there was one)? Maybe that will help get you on the right track.

>> But why try to get PHP working in cygwin? The Windows version of PHP
>> works fine (as does Apache). Or, if you need Linux, load a real Linux
>> distro (I use Debian but Ubuntu is also good, I hear) in a virtual box
>> under Windows.
>
> I'm still stuck with Windows XP (I know, I should have already
> upgraded), so I can't run the native Windows build of PHP 5.5. But even
> after upgrading I would prefer being able to compile PHP in a Unix like
> environment. I would prefer using Cygwin over a virtual machine
> installation of a Linux system, as it is more lightweight and may
> suffice for my purposes.
>

Yup, XP is at EOL and pretty soon there won't be any further updates. I
know it's a hassle - I still have a couple of programs which don't run
under Windows 7 (even in emulation mode) so I have to use a Windows XP
virtual box. A hassle.

And yes, cygwin is more lightweight; if the overhead of a virtual box is
a problem for you, than that's the way to go.

Of course, you can get some pretty cheap laptops nowadays. Maybe it
would be worth investing in one and just installing Linux on it :)

Or if you don't need to move around, desktops are getting even cheaper :))

--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
JDS Computer Training Corp.
jstucklex(at)attglobal(dot)net
==================
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: switch with case 0
Next Topic: Re: korean character sets
Goto Forum:
  

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ]

Current Time: Sun Nov 24 19:44:30 GMT 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.04159 seconds