| Re: has anyone used multithreaded PHP appserver.io for application? [message #183418 is a reply to message #183414] |
Wed, 23 October 2013 20:09   |
Arno Welzel
Messages: 317
Registered: October 2011
Karma:
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Jerry Stuckle, 2013-10-23 20:09:
[Fullquote deleted - is this really neccessary?]
> This "response" is so full of holes it's not even worth a response. But
Which holes? Can you name at least one? Can you show me where I'm wrong
in my knowledge about Apache Geronimo and that Tomcat is not just a
different server besides Geronimo?
> that's what I've come to expect from you, Arno. You're right about
> everything, even when you have no idea what you're talking about (as
> here). And everyone else is wrong.
As I know you... no details and no *specific* critics, just a generic
"you don't know what you are talking about"...
> For your information, I was working with application servers way back in
> the 80's - long before the internet became popular. Unlike you, I DO
If you want to say I wouldn't respect your age and experience - you're
wrong. This was not the point and I apologize if you got it wrong.
> know what an application server is. And unlike you, I DO know how to
> set up Apache as an application server. You obviously don't, so you
Me too - so what?
> claim it can't be done. You haven't even researched it, have you? Not
Where exactly did I claim that Apache HTTP Server can not be used to
serve applications? I never questioned, that Apache HTTP Servers can be
used like this - I just asked how *YOU* define "application server"
since I don't agree with "applications are just another URI" - this is
way to simplified.
You could have answered, that "application server" is a concept and not
just a software and also post some references for further information,
so others could learn something as well.
But no - instead you rely on your big ego. If you say something
everybody else will just have to take this for granted like
"Applications are just another URI. Apache can server applications just
as easily as it can server web pages." - and that's it - perdiod. If
Jerry Stuckle says this, it has to be like that and no further
discussion about the topic "what are application servers and why are
there different Apache projects to deal with different needs".
And you tell ME that I assume "everybody else is wrong", if a say
something. Remember of <stefan(dot)willkommer(at)googlemail(dot)com>? He didn't
agree to you as well. Of course you will see this as an irrelevant post
by someone who does not know anything about this topic as well - don't you?
And I already mentioned in <5264F77F(dot)9040908(at)arnowelzel(dot)de> that I asked
YOU if YOU mean using MODULES in APACHE by "using Apache HTTP Server as
application server". BTW - I also use Phusion Passenger for some of our
applications besides the PHP stuff.
And your answer to this was:
"But I see you don't understand how an application server works. It
figures."
And in <l46llo$qjo$2(at)dont-email(dot)me> you even confirmed my assumption:
"You don't understand all of the capabilities of Apache if you don't
understand it can also serve applications.
Sure, it's *main* purpose is as a webserver. But it can do so much
more, with the appropriate modules."
> that it matters - you would just claim whomever posted the information
> you disagree with is wrong, also.
Where exactly did I say anything like this? Where exactly did I
disagree, that Apache can be used to serve applications using modules?
> I'm outta here, troll.
As all this is already WAY off topic - F'Up to poster if you really want
to discuss opinions. For me end of public discussion here - if you want
to go on, send me an e-mail or let it be. I apoloogize for bringing so
much noise in here - but to be honest you must admit, that you are also
a bit stubborn in way ;-)
--
Arno Welzel
http://arnowelzel.de
http://de-rec-fahrrad.de
|
|
|
|
Calendar
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
]