FUDforum: comp.lang.php » well it works!

Home » Imported messages » comp.lang.php » well it works!

Show: Today's Messages :: Polls :: Message Navigator

Re: well it works! [message #184101 is a reply to message #184100]

Thu, 05 December 2013 12:51

Ben Bacarisse
Messages: 82
Registered: November 2013

Karma:

Member

"Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a(dot)nony(dot)mous(at)example(dot)invalid> writes:

> Ben Bacarisse wrote:
>
>> Arno Welzel writes:
>>> Jerry Stuckle wrote:
>>>> Tim Streater wrote:
>>>> > richard the sto0pid wrote:
>>>> >> Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
>>>> >>> You should find a new hobby.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Says you.
>>>> >
>>>> > I think says every bugger on this newsgroup.
>>>>
>>>> +1
>>>
>>> +2
>>
>> -1. His hobby is mostly harmless and no one is obliged to answer a
>> question just because it's asked. There's a whiff (only a whiff) of
>> bullying about the almost universal opprobrium with which I am slightly
>> uncomfortable.
>>
>> He does post incorrect answers on occasion, but lots of people do that
>> (myself included) without being told to get a new hobby.
>
> You probably aren't as aware of RtS's history on Usenet as some of the
> rest of us - and not just history of his web site activities. This goes
> back a long way.

I think I am, but obviously I can't be sure that I know what you are
referring to. But I am having a hard time imagining what history would
alter my current opinion. I would not mind (indeed I'd join in with)
fierce criticism of bad behaviour like racist remarks, but I'd do that
at the time. What is currently being criticised seems to me to be right
down the middle of internet annoyances: he's got an incorrect sense of
what he knows, he asks questions that he should have already learned the
answers to, and he can get angry and rude when that's pointed out. All
these suggest that leaving him alone is a better strategy than baiting
him.

As an aside, I try to answer questions based on the value of the answer.
If I think I can add something, I do, even if the specific poster asking
the question is a troll or some otherwise annoying poster. I say this
only to explain why I've answered someone I am suggesting might be best
ignored -- I mean best ignored unless the reply has it's own value.

--
Ben.

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		well it works! By: Mr Oldies on Wed, 04 December 2013 15:57
		Re: well it works! By: Beauregard T. Shagnas on Wed, 04 December 2013 18:55
		Re: well it works! By: Mr Oldies on Wed, 04 December 2013 20:02
		Re: well it works! By: Tim Streater on Wed, 04 December 2013 21:10
		Re: well it works! By: Jerry Stuckle on Thu, 05 December 2013 04:56
		Re: well it works! By: Arno Welzel on Thu, 05 December 2013 07:27
		Re: well it works! By: Ben Bacarisse on Thu, 05 December 2013 10:21
		Re: well it works! By: Beauregard T. Shagnas on Thu, 05 December 2013 12:08
		Re: well it works! By: Ben Bacarisse on Thu, 05 December 2013 12:51
		Re: well it works! By: Arno Welzel on Thu, 05 December 2013 13:35
		Re: well it works! By: The Natural Philosoph on Thu, 05 December 2013 14:15
		Re: well it works! By: Beauregard T. Shagnas on Thu, 05 December 2013 15:15
		Re: well it works! By: Ben Bacarisse on Thu, 05 December 2013 17:15
		Re: well it works! By: Beauregard T. Shagnas on Thu, 05 December 2013 19:11
		Re: well it works! By: The Natural Philosoph on Thu, 05 December 2013 14:08
		Re: well it works! By: Beauregard T. Shagnas on Wed, 04 December 2013 22:03
		Re: well it works! By: Mr Oldies on Thu, 05 December 2013 21:42
		Re: well it works! By: Beauregard T. Shagnas on Thu, 05 December 2013 23:20
		Re: well it works! By: Evan Platt on Thu, 05 December 2013 01:20
		Re: well it works! By: Peter H. Coffin on Thu, 05 December 2013 02:24
		Re: well it works! By: Evan Platt on Sat, 07 December 2013 05:50
		Re: well it works! By: Denis McMahon on Wed, 04 December 2013 21:21
		Re: well it works! By: Scott Johnson on Wed, 04 December 2013 23:37
		Re: well it works! By: Evan Platt on Thu, 05 December 2013 01:19
		no it does not [Re: well it works!] By: Luuk on Sat, 07 December 2013 11:21
		Re: no it does not [Re: well it works!] By: Denis McMahon on Sat, 07 December 2013 14:05
		Re: no it does not [Re: well it works!] By: Luuk on Sat, 07 December 2013 15:12
		Re: no it does not [Re: well it works!] By: Dennis on Sat, 07 December 2013 15:27
		Re: no it does not [Re: well it works!] By: Evan Platt on Sat, 07 December 2013 16:24
		Re: no it does not [Re: well it works!] By: Luuk on Sat, 07 December 2013 16:31
		Re: no it does not [Re: well it works!] By: The Natural Philosoph on Sat, 07 December 2013 17:35
		Re: no it does not [Re: well it works!] By: Mr Oldies on Sun, 08 December 2013 17:33
		Re: no it does not [Re: well it works!] By: Luuk on Sun, 08 December 2013 18:20
		Re: no it does not [Re: well it works!] By: Denis McMahon on Sun, 08 December 2013 20:14
		Re: no it does not [Re: well it works!] By: Norman Peelman on Sun, 08 December 2013 23:14
		Re: no it does not [Re: well it works!] By: Mr Oldies on Mon, 09 December 2013 00:59
		Re: no it does not [Re: well it works!] By: Beauregard T. Shagnas on Mon, 09 December 2013 02:00
		Re: no it does not [Re: well it works!] By: Mr Oldies on Mon, 09 December 2013 02:17
		Re: no it does not [Re: well it works!] By: Beauregard T. Shagnas on Mon, 09 December 2013 03:13
		Re: no it does not [Re: well it works!] By: Norman Peelman on Mon, 09 December 2013 11:31
		Re: no it does not [Re: well it works!] By: Mr Oldies on Mon, 09 December 2013 19:12
		Re: no it does not [Re: well it works!] By: Norman Peelman on Tue, 10 December 2013 04:15

Previous Topic:	finding key values in array
Next Topic:	Apache HTTP Server

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

]

Current Time: Sun Nov 24 21:28:06 GMT 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.04571 seconds