FUDforum: FUDforum Suggestions

Home » FUDforum » FUDforum Suggestions » better img tag

Show: Today's Messages :: Polls :: Message Navigator

Re: better img tag [message #4677 is a reply to message #4676]

Fri, 02 August 2002 14:54

Ilia

Messages: 13241
Registered: January 2002

Karma:

Senior Member
Administrator
Core Developer

Images are a 'special' kinda tag, because of the problems with them there are a number of controls specific to images, such as the ability to limit the # of images per message as well as the ability to disable image tags specifically.

Specifying size won't solve the problem, since most people won't do it anyway and a person can easy say that image's size is 2000X2000 pixels effectively taking up the entire page and more.

There is no 'good' solution to this problem. Your best bet is to
ask your forum members to restrain themselves to certain scale for their images, and if they do not heed to your request handle the issue accordingly. Whether it be disabling of images tags to taking away posting privileges of people who ignore this request is already up to you.

FUDforum Core Developer

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		better img tag By: JamesS on Fri, 02 August 2002 14:47
		Re: better img tag By: Ilia on Fri, 02 August 2002 14:54
		Re: better img tag By: smike on Mon, 05 August 2002 20:44
		Re: better img tag By: Ilia on Mon, 05 August 2002 20:51
		Re: better img tag By: smike on Mon, 05 August 2002 21:08
		Re: better img tag By: Ilia on Tue, 06 August 2002 02:52
		Re: better img tag By: smike on Tue, 06 August 2002 06:29
		img image width By: Hurry on Wed, 02 November 2005 21:16
		Re: img image width By: Ilia on Wed, 02 November 2005 22:55
		Re : better img tag By: math_adm on Tue, 15 November 2005 09:13

Previous Topic:	Add subscription option for message navigator
Next Topic:	Automatically subscribe moderators

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

]

Current Time: Sat Nov 23 20:59:04 GMT 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.05619 seconds