FUDforum
Fast Uncompromising Discussions. FUDforum will get your users talking.

Home » FUDforum » FUDforum Installation Issues » Version indicates 2.3.3 after upgrading to 2.3.4
Show: Today's Messages :: Polls :: Message Navigator
Switch to threaded view of this topic Create a new topic Submit Reply
Version indicates 2.3.3 after upgrading to 2.3.4 [message #6938] Tue, 29 October 2002 15:13 Go to next message
kenp is currently offline  kenp   United States
Messages: 7
Registered: October 2002
Karma: 0
Junior Member
Hi folks,

After upgrading to the new version it indicates I'm still running 2.3.3. It very well could have something to do with the way I had to upgrade due to safe mode problems on a remote server.

What I had to do is save my forum settings - nuke the forum and data files - run 'install.php' for 2.3.4 - apply my saved settings to the forum.

I'm pretty sure that 2.3.4 is running because the 'submit reply' button (which, I think, was added in 2.3.4) is there alongside the 'spell check' and 'preview' options.

Is there anyway that I can conclusively check that I'm running 2.3.4 and a file I can edit to change the displayed version number?

Aside from that.....thanks for this very productive and easy to manage software. The quality is very impressive.

ken

Re: Version indicates 2.3.3 after upgrading to 2.3.4 [message #6939 is a reply to message #6938] Tue, 29 October 2002 15:33 Go to previous messageGo to next message
zapal   Poland
Messages: 68
Registered: October 2002
Location: Poland
Karma: 0
Member
The version number is hardcoded in include/core.inc (variable $FORUM_VERSION). Maybe you took the wrong install.php file?
Re: Version indicates 2.3.3 after upgrading to 2.3.4 [message #6940 is a reply to message #6939] Tue, 29 October 2002 16:11 Go to previous messageGo to next message
kenp is currently offline  kenp   United States
Messages: 7
Registered: October 2002
Karma: 0
Junior Member
The file I used was dated 10/28/02 8:14 AM out of the tarball. I browsed through some of the files in the include dir and the comment sections on some files (i.e., nntp.inc) indicate a date after the 2.3.3 release which was 21oct02, I think.

If it is actually 2.3.4 than I'll simply change the version number in the core.inc file you pointed out and include that procedure in my future upgrades.

Thanks for replying,

ken
Re: Version indicates 2.3.3 after upgrading to 2.3.4 [message #6941 is a reply to message #6940] Tue, 29 October 2002 16:17 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Ilia is currently offline  Ilia   Canada
Messages: 13241
Registered: January 2002
Karma: 0
Senior Member
Administrator
Core Developer
The file date is not relavent, because the file was created during decompressiong. Inside the file there is a CVS $Id line containing the actual CVS date of the file. Core.inc's date should be 2002/10/27 17:09:38

FUDforum Core Developer
Re: Version indicates 2.3.3 after upgrading to 2.3.4 [message #6942 is a reply to message #6941] Tue, 29 October 2002 16:53 Go to previous messageGo to next message
kenp is currently offline  kenp   United States
Messages: 7
Registered: October 2002
Karma: 0
Junior Member
I found the entry you were referencing:

$Id: core.inc,v 1.35 2002/10/27 17:09:38 hackie Exp $

I'm going to install the forum once more and let you know what I find.

Thanks,

ken
Re: Version indicates 2.3.3 after upgrading to 2.3.4 [message #6945 is a reply to message #6942] Tue, 29 October 2002 17:08 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Ilia is currently offline  Ilia   Canada
Messages: 13241
Registered: January 2002
Karma: 0
Senior Member
Administrator
Core Developer
Then you should be seeing 2.3.4 as the forum version.

FUDforum Core Developer
Re: Version indicates 2.3.3 after upgrading to 2.3.4 [message #6948 is a reply to message #6942] Tue, 29 October 2002 17:22 Go to previous messageGo to next message
kenp is currently offline  kenp   United States
Messages: 7
Registered: October 2002
Karma: 0
Junior Member
ok.....I performed a data dump, removed the forum and related data files from the server and installed the 2.3.4 package. Prior to importing the saved data the forum displayed version number 2.3.4. After importing it reverted to displaying 2.3.3.

I'm sure it's due to an unorthodox install procedure but can I safely assume it's actually 2.3.4 incognito?

ken
Re: Version indicates 2.3.3 after upgrading to 2.3.4 [message #6949 is a reply to message #6948] Tue, 29 October 2002 17:27 Go to previous messageGo to next message
zapal   Poland
Messages: 68
Registered: October 2002
Location: Poland
Karma: 0
Member
Does core.inc tell you that you have 2.3.4?

If so, then it maybe the problem with compiled files. Just regenerate them.
Re: Version indicates 2.3.3 after upgrading to 2.3.4 [message #6950 is a reply to message #6938] Tue, 29 October 2002 17:41 Go to previous messageGo to next message
kenp is currently offline  kenp   United States
Messages: 7
Registered: October 2002
Karma: 0
Junior Member
The core.inc displays: $Id: core.inc,v 1.33 2002/10/20 19:46:24 hackie Exp $

I'll attempt to regenerate anyway although I don't think it will make a difference.
Re: Version indicates 2.3.3 after upgrading to 2.3.4 [message #6951 is a reply to message #6950] Tue, 29 October 2002 18:19 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Ilia is currently offline  Ilia   Canada
Messages: 13241
Registered: January 2002
Karma: 0
Senior Member
Administrator
Core Developer
What you did was WRONG.

Thr upgrade procedure involves running the upgrade script not what you did. When you re-imported the 2.3.3 datadump the certain files like core.inc were replaced in the process. So, you are running an underminate mix of 2.3.3 and 2.3.4


FUDforum Core Developer
Re: Version indicates 2.3.3 after upgrading to 2.3.4 [message #6953 is a reply to message #6938] Tue, 29 October 2002 18:38 Go to previous messageGo to next message
kenp is currently offline  kenp   United States
Messages: 7
Registered: October 2002
Karma: 0
Junior Member
That's what I thought. The import function doesn't function properly across different versions.

Due to problems with safe mode (which is way beyond my knowledge level) I cannot use the upgrade file. The only way someone in my boat can truely upgrade is to nuke the previous version and start over.....which plainly sucks.

Thanks for your help.

ken

Re: Version indicates 2.3.3 after upgrading to 2.3.4 [message #6954 is a reply to message #6953] Tue, 29 October 2002 18:45 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Ilia is currently offline  Ilia   Canada
Messages: 13241
Registered: January 2002
Karma: 0
Senior Member
Administrator
Core Developer
A number of people use forums within a safe_mode enviroment and they had not reported any problems with the upgrade process.

FUDforum Core Developer
Re: Version indicates 2.3.3 after upgrading to 2.3.4 [message #6955 is a reply to message #6953] Tue, 29 October 2002 19:21 Go to previous message
kenp is currently offline  kenp   United States
Messages: 7
Registered: October 2002
Karma: 0
Junior Member
My situation is exactly like this one:

http://fud.prohost.org/forum/index.php?t=msg&th=1161&start=0&ri d=504&S=b091fd7e23d03c8bbd3c24252063fa38

Since I just setup the forum, I really don't have alot of information to replace. On the next upgrade, I'll attempt to compress the upgrade files from cvs and see how it goes.
  Switch to threaded view of this topic Create a new topic Submit Reply
Previous Topic: Renaming forum root folder after install
Next Topic: Number of fields needed for mySQL table
Goto Forum:
  

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ]

Current Time: Sun Nov 24 02:44:41 GMT 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.03724 seconds