FUDforum
Fast Uncompromising Discussions. FUDforum will get your users talking.

Home » FUDforum Development » FUDforum 3.0+ » PhpBB v/s Fud =) (Again?)  () 1 Vote
Show: Today's Messages :: Polls :: Message Navigator
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: PhpBB v/s Fud =) (Again?) [message #9428 is a reply to message #9399] Thu, 27 March 2003 15:50 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
Pda0 is currently offline  Pda0   Chile
Messages: 6
Registered: March 2003
Location: Chile
Karma:
Junior Member
I agree, but.. for example, let's say that M2F integrates mbox reading for some MTA's. Some users may not have access to a procmail or forward device, but they may do have to the mbox file. As M2F is concentrated in resolving these type of issues, it would get out a new version with this new functionality quickly. The same thing applies to POP3, IMAP mail extraction, mailing list integration (ie ezmlm)... etc

I doubt you would want to implement all this functionality out-of-the box, at least initially, as you would be overlooking main forum problems, issues and requests.

(Off-topic: The latest reply notification of this thread got to my mail in _GERMAN_!! "Neue Antwort an PhpBB"... DOH)

.pd
prottoss wrote on Wed, 26 March 2003 11:12

Well, there are some counter points to this. FUDforum is a bulletin board application and all of it's components are specifically tuned for that specific task. Meaning that as far as importing data into FUDforum no wrapper or general perpouse application would be faster. If it is faster it simple means FUDforum code needs some tunning...

[Message index]
 
Read Message icon4.gif
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Here is the dutch translation of the forum
Next Topic: Fatal error:
Goto Forum:
  

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ]

Current Time: Sun Nov 24 01:44:19 GMT 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.03800 seconds