| Re: How to convert this PHP into JavaScript [message #173200 is a reply to message #173198] |
Sun, 27 March 2011 01:55   |
Jerry Stuckle
Messages: 2598
Registered: September 2010
Karma:
|
Senior Member |
|
|
On 3/26/2011 9:48 PM, sheldonlg wrote:
> On 3/26/2011 3:36 PM, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
>> On 3/26/2011 2:53 PM, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
>>> Jerry Stuckle wrote:
>>>
>>>> Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
>>>> > Jerry Stuckle wrote:
>>>> >> Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
>>>> >>> Maybe not, as the presented return value of json_encode()
>>>> >>> corresponds
>>>> >>> with what the OP asked for; only that for some reason sheldonlg
>>>> >>> used 1
>>>> >>> instead of the '1 AND (2 OR 3)' of the OP. So much for cluelessness.
>>>> >> Yup, you really have no clue.
>>>> > Suppose I am somehow wrong suggesting json_encode() as the solution to
>>>> > the OP's problem, perhaps you would enlighten me, then? It would,
>>>> > after
>>>> > all, fit your ego, which appears to be the only thing you care about.
>>>> > It's your chance to hit me really hard!
>>>>
>>>> Let me correct myself. You have absolutely no fricking clue. […]
>>>
>>> I take it then that you are not actually interested in backing up your
>>> statements as you have nothing to back them up at all, and that you
>>> are just
>>> a loudmouth who does not know the first thing about client-side
>>> ECMAScript-
>>> based scripting. I wish I could say that I am surprised, but I am not.
>>>
>>> Unsurprisingly, you have failed to quote properly again. For the
>>> intellectually challenged: Only the parts relevant to an answer
>>> should be
>>> quoted, which usually (and certainly here) excludes signatures.
>>>
>>>
>>> PointedEars
>>
>> Nope, I'm not going to try to tell you were you're wrong because you
>> don't even have the most basic ability to understand why you're wrong
>> (and Shelly's right). But you have to argue anyway.
>
> As I stated in a reply I made 15 seconds ago, please leave me out of any
> future fighting between the two of you. All I wanted to do was to help
> the OP.
>
>>
>> I've already learned all you'll do is spout off about unrelated things
>> and try to change the subject - because you really have no idea what
>> you're talking about. That's your normal mode of operation.
>>
>> And before telling other people to quote like YOU think they should (and
>> BTW, you're full of sheet there, also), YOU should learn to follow your
>> own advice.
>>
>> But then that's also typical of trolls.
>>
>
>
You don't have to be in it, Shelly. But since "Pointed Head" brought
you up, I was just pointing out that you are right and he isn't.
You can choose to be a part of the conversation or not. By replying, it
looks like you've chosen to be a part.
--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
JDS Computer Training Corp.
jstucklex(at)attglobal(dot)net
==================
|
|
|
|
Calendar
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
]