FUDforum: comp.lang.php » problem saving date fields

Home » Imported messages » comp.lang.php » problem saving date fields

Show: Today's Messages :: Polls :: Message Navigator

Re: problem saving date fields [message #174145 is a reply to message #174144]

Mon, 23 May 2011 04:51

Co
Messages: 75
Registered: May 2011

Karma:

Member

On 23 mei, 04:30, Jerry Stuckle <jstuck...@attglobal.net> wrote:
> On 5/22/2011 10:20 PM, Jeff North wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>> On Sun, 22 May 2011 20:21:14 -0400, in comp.lang.php Jerry Stuckle
>> <jstuck...@attglobal.net>
>> <irc99s$50...@dont-email.me> wrote:
>
>>> | On 5/22/2011 7:01 PM, Jeff North wrote:
>>> |> On Sun, 22 May 2011 13:47:29 -0400, in comp.lang.php Jerry Stuckle
>>> |> <jstuck...@attglobal.net>
>>> |> <irbi7i$gq...@dont-email.me> wrote:
>>> |>
>>> |>> | On 5/22/2011 10:08 AM, Jeff North wrote:
>>> |>> |> On Sun, 22 May 2011 08:26:48 -0400, in comp.lang.php Jerry Stuckle
>>> |>> |> <jstuck...@attglobal.net>
>>> |>> |> <irave9$qd...@dont-email.me> wrote:
>>> |>> |>
>>> |>> |>> | On 5/22/2011 12:28 AM, Jeff North wrote:
>>> |>> |>> |> On Sat, 21 May 2011 20:01:17 -0400, in comp.lang.php Jerry Stuckle
>>> |>> |>> |> <jstuck...@attglobal.net>
>>> |>> |>> |> <ir9jom$66...@dont-email.me> wrote:
>>> |>> |>
>>> |>> |> [snip]
>>> |>> |>
>>> |>> |>> |> http://www.apps.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3676.html#sec-4.3
>>> |>> |>> |> "There is a long-standing convention in Usenet news which also
>>> |>> |>> |> commonly appears in Internet mail of using "-- " as the separator line
>>> |>> |>> |> between the body and the signature of a message. When generating a
>>> |>> |>> |> Format=Flowed message containing a Usenet-style separator before the
>>> |>> |>> |> signature, the separator line is sent as-is."
>>> |>> |>> |
>>> |>> |>> | Which RFC is that?
>>> |>> |>
>>> |>> |> Have a look at the hyperlink provided but incase you can't read
>>> |>> |> hyperlinks it is RFC 3676 - the one that YOU provided - remember?
>>> |>> |>
>>> |>> |>> |> Now where does it state "It needs to be exactly
>>> |>> |>> |> hyphen-hyphen-space-newline."
>>> |>> |>> |
>>> |>> |>> | In the RFC. But you can't read either, so we also know you are an idiot.
>>> |>> |>
>>> |>> |> Which RFC is that - it isn't in the one you provided (3676 or 3736).
>>> |>> |> Care to provide another RFC?
>>> |>> |
>>> |>> | 3767. Learn to read, idiot. But we already know that is beyond your
>>> |>> | limited capabilities.
>>> |>
>>> |> First it was 3736, then 3676 and on the third attempt we have 3767!!!
>>> |>
>>> |> What on earth has "Securely Available Credentials Protocol" got to do
>>> |> with the signature line format?
>>> |
>>> | What an idiot. Sure, it was a typo. It's 3676,
>
>> IOW your full of crap.
>
> IOW, your mommy isn't around to read it to you.
>
>
>
>>> | but it really doesn't
>>> | make any difference anyway, because the rfc has words of more than one
>>> | syllable, so you can't understand it, anyway.
>>> |
>>> | Once again you prove what an idiot you are. Can't even learn to google
>>> | for yourself.
>>> |
>>> | Does your mommy read books to you? And maybe even these usenet posts?
>
> --
> ==================
> Remove the "x" from my email address
> Jerry Stuckle
> JDS Computer Training Corp.
> jstuck...@attglobal.net
> ==================

Wow you guys really love each other.

Marco

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		problem saving date fields By: Co on Fri, 20 May 2011 18:38
		Re: problem saving date fields By: Luuk on Fri, 20 May 2011 18:50
		Re: problem saving date fields By: Co on Fri, 20 May 2011 21:00
		Re: problem saving date fields By: Jerry Stuckle on Fri, 20 May 2011 22:24
		Re: problem saving date fields By: Co on Fri, 20 May 2011 22:52
		Re: problem saving date fields By: Jerry Stuckle on Sat, 21 May 2011 02:30
		Re: problem saving date fields By: Luuk on Sat, 21 May 2011 07:57
		Re: problem saving date fields By: Co on Sat, 21 May 2011 08:34
		Re: problem saving date fields By: Luuk on Sat, 21 May 2011 09:29
		Re: problem saving date fields By: Co on Sat, 21 May 2011 12:12
		Re: problem saving date fields By: Luuk on Sat, 21 May 2011 13:46
		Re: problem saving date fields By: Luuk on Sat, 21 May 2011 14:02
		Re: problem saving date fields By: Co on Sat, 21 May 2011 14:09
		Re: problem saving date fields By: Luuk on Sat, 21 May 2011 14:34
		Re: problem saving date fields By: Jeff North on Fri, 20 May 2011 22:58
		Re: problem saving date fields By: Jerry Stuckle on Sat, 21 May 2011 02:35
		Re: problem saving date fields By: Jeff North on Sat, 21 May 2011 03:13
		Re: problem saving date fields By: Co on Sat, 21 May 2011 06:47
		Re: problem saving date fields By: Co on Sat, 21 May 2011 07:18
		Re: problem saving date fields By: Luuk on Sat, 21 May 2011 07:54
		Re: problem saving date fields By: Jerry Stuckle on Sat, 21 May 2011 14:37
		Re: problem saving date fields By: Co on Sat, 21 May 2011 15:07
		Re: problem saving date fields By: Jerry Stuckle on Sat, 21 May 2011 23:55
		Re: problem saving date fields By: Co on Sun, 22 May 2011 21:20
		Re: problem saving date fields By: Jerry Stuckle on Sun, 22 May 2011 21:28
		Re: problem saving date fields By: Jerry Stuckle on Sat, 21 May 2011 14:32
		Re: problem saving date fields By: Jeff North on Sat, 21 May 2011 16:08
		Re: problem saving date fields By: Jerry Stuckle on Sun, 22 May 2011 00:01
		Re: problem saving date fields By: Twayne on Sun, 22 May 2011 00:30
		Re: problem saving date fields By: Jerry Stuckle on Sun, 22 May 2011 03:13
		Re: problem saving date fields By: Jeff North on Sun, 22 May 2011 04:28
		Re: problem saving date fields By: Thomas 'PointedEars' on Sun, 22 May 2011 10:45
		Re: problem saving date fields By: Jerry Stuckle on Sun, 22 May 2011 12:26
		Re: problem saving date fields By: Twayne on Sun, 22 May 2011 13:20
		Re: problem saving date fields By: Jeff North on Sun, 22 May 2011 14:08
		Re: problem saving date fields By: Jerry Stuckle on Sun, 22 May 2011 17:47
		Re: problem saving date fields By: me on Sun, 22 May 2011 18:17
		Re: problem saving date fields By: Jerry Stuckle on Sun, 22 May 2011 18:26
		Re: problem saving date fields By: me on Sun, 22 May 2011 20:27
		Re: problem saving date fields By: Jeff North on Sun, 22 May 2011 23:01
		Re: problem saving date fields By: Jerry Stuckle on Mon, 23 May 2011 00:21
		Re: problem saving date fields By: me on Mon, 23 May 2011 01:36
		Re: problem saving date fields By: Jerry Stuckle on Mon, 23 May 2011 01:46
		Re: problem saving date fields By: Jeff North on Mon, 23 May 2011 02:20
		Re: problem saving date fields By: Jerry Stuckle on Mon, 23 May 2011 02:30
		Re: problem saving date fields By: Co on Mon, 23 May 2011 04:51
		Re: problem saving date fields By: Jerry Stuckle on Mon, 23 May 2011 11:13
		Re: problem saving date fields By: Co on Mon, 23 May 2011 17:18
		Re: problem saving date fields By: Co on Mon, 23 May 2011 17:27
		Re: problem saving date fields By: Jerry Stuckle on Mon, 23 May 2011 18:16
		Re: problem saving date fields By: Co on Mon, 23 May 2011 19:17
		Re: problem saving date fields By: Jerry Stuckle on Mon, 23 May 2011 22:00
		Re: problem saving date fields By: Co on Tue, 24 May 2011 05:30
		Re: problem saving date fields By: Jerry Stuckle on Tue, 24 May 2011 09:45
		Re: problem saving date fields By: Co on Thu, 26 May 2011 09:10
		Re: problem saving date fields By: Jerry Stuckle on Thu, 26 May 2011 09:43
		Re: problem saving date fields By: Co on Mon, 23 May 2011 21:26
		Re: problem saving date fields By: Jerry Stuckle on Mon, 23 May 2011 22:01
		Re: problem saving date fields By: Thomas 'PointedEars' on Mon, 23 May 2011 21:59
		Re: problem saving date fields By: Twayne on Sun, 22 May 2011 13:11

Previous Topic:	is dis da place?
Next Topic:	foreach in reverse

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

]

Current Time: Sun Nov 10 12:24:31 GMT 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.04113 seconds