| Re: including CSS & JS on only pages that need that CSS & JS [message #175610 is a reply to message #175608] |
Tue, 11 October 2011 10:29   |
The Natural Philosoph
Messages: 993
Registered: September 2010
Karma:
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Tim Streater wrote:
> In article <RyOkq.4249$%m(dot)1042(at)newsfe05(dot)iad>,
> "Mr. B-o-B" <wtf(dot)chuck(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> On 10/10/2011 10:04 PM, Jerry Stuckle cried from the depths of the abyss:
>>> On 10/10/2011 10:35 PM, Mr. B-o-B wrote:
>>>> On 10/10/2011 12:44 PM, Jerry Stuckle cried from the depths of the
>> abyss:
>>>>
>>>> >
>>>> > There are a lot of things that "work". That doesn't mean they are
>> good
>>>> > things to do - as I pointed out in my first reply to you.
>>>>
>>>> You haven't actually pointed out anything. Forgot your med's again?
>>>>
>>>
>>> I pointed out several things wrong with your crappy code. But I know
>> you
>>> can't read, much less write.
>>>
>>
>> Again, no you didn't. Take your med's little Jerry, and go to bed.
>
> Take his med's *what*? His med doesn't have a little Jerry - so what are
> you *talking* about?
>
bad grammar and punctuation.
How coders ever manage to write bug free code when they cant even write
clear English can only be ascribed to the fact that they are happier
talking to computers than human beings.
Try
"Take your meds, little Jerry, and go to bed."
|
|
|
|
Calendar
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
]