FUDforum: comp.lang.php » Implied cast differs from explicit cast

Home » Imported messages » comp.lang.php » Implied cast differs from explicit cast

Show: Today's Messages :: Polls :: Message Navigator

Re: Implied cast differs from explicit cast [message #176660 is a reply to message #176659]

Mon, 16 January 2012 03:39

Jerry Stuckle
Messages: 2598
Registered: September 2010

Karma:

Senior Member

On 1/15/2012 10:08 PM, lb wrote:
> jstucklex(at)attglobal(dot)net wrote:
>> ...
>> No, it is not. '0x12' is a hex number, not an integer. (int)'0x12'
>> converts this correctly to 0.
>
> OK, but if (int)'0x12' is 0, why is '0x12'+0 == 18?
>
> Why are they different? Aren't they both doing 'string conversion to number'?

As I said - '0x12' is a hex value, not an integer. You are trying to
convert it as if it were a string representation of an integer. The
implicit conversion recognizes it is a hex value and uses the
appropriate conversion.

--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
JDS Computer Training Corp.
jstucklex(at)attglobal(dot)net
==================

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Implied cast differs from explicit cast By: lb on Mon, 16 January 2012 01:10
		Re: Implied cast differs from explicit cast By: Jerry Stuckle on Mon, 16 January 2012 01:51
		Re: Implied cast differs from explicit cast By: lb on Mon, 16 January 2012 03:08
		Re: Implied cast differs from explicit cast By: Jerry Stuckle on Mon, 16 January 2012 03:39
		Re: Implied cast differs from explicit cast By: Arno Welzel on Mon, 16 January 2012 07:42
		Re: Implied cast differs from explicit cast By: Curtis Dyer on Mon, 16 January 2012 09:04
		Re: Implied cast differs from explicit cast By: Jerry Stuckle on Mon, 16 January 2012 13:25
		Re: Implied cast differs from explicit cast By: M. Strobel on Mon, 16 January 2012 18:51
		Re: Implied cast differs from explicit cast By: The Natural Philosoph on Mon, 16 January 2012 13:28
		Re: Implied cast differs from explicit cast By: Jerry Stuckle on Mon, 16 January 2012 13:45
		Re: Implied cast differs from explicit cast By: Arno Welzel on Tue, 17 January 2012 05:59
		Re: Implied cast differs from explicit cast By: Arno Welzel on Tue, 17 January 2012 06:00
		Re: Implied cast differs from explicit cast By: Jerry Stuckle on Tue, 17 January 2012 13:17
		Re: Implied cast differs from explicit cast By: Jerry Stuckle on Tue, 17 January 2012 13:16
		Re: Implied cast differs from explicit cast By: Arno Welzel on Thu, 19 January 2012 12:36
		Re: Implied cast differs from explicit cast By: Arno Welzel on Thu, 19 January 2012 12:39
		Re: Implied cast differs from explicit cast By: Jerry Stuckle on Thu, 19 January 2012 14:06
		Re: Implied cast differs from explicit cast By: Jerry Stuckle on Thu, 19 January 2012 14:05
		Re: Implied cast differs from explicit cast By: The Natural Philosoph on Thu, 19 January 2012 15:01
		Re: Implied cast differs from explicit cast By: Jerry Stuckle on Thu, 19 January 2012 19:41
		Re: Implied cast differs from explicit cast By: M. Strobel on Mon, 16 January 2012 08:49
		Re: Implied cast differs from explicit cast By: alvaro.NOSPAMTHANX on Mon, 16 January 2012 10:48
		Re: Implied cast differs from explicit cast By: lb on Tue, 17 January 2012 02:35

Previous Topic:	Open Source Development
Next Topic:	error from phpadmin

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

]

Current Time: Sun Dec 01 04:10:12 GMT 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.04655 seconds