| Re: OOP versus Procedural/Functional [message #177603 is a reply to message #177602] |
Tue, 10 April 2012 17:19   |
The Natural Philosoph
Messages: 993
Registered: September 2010
Karma:
|
Senior Member |
|
|
M. Strobel wrote:
> Am 10.04.2012 17:07, schrieb Tim Streater:
>> In article <jm17jg$iq0$1(at)news(dot)albasani(dot)net>,
>> The Natural Philosopher <tnp(at)invalid(dot)invalid> wrote:
>>
>>> Goran wrote:
>>>> On 9.4.2012 21:35, Mr. B-o-B wrote:
>>>> > I was curious about peoples thoughts in regards to OOP with PHP.
>>>> >
>>>> > Are there pro's/con's of writing OOP code versus procedural/functional
>>>> > coding?
>>>> > If you stick with procedural programming you will never get a decent job :D
>>> True. Its one of those fashions that everybody has to do, like wearing a suit at a
>>> bank used to be.
>>>
>>> No doubt it will pass in time.
>> OO could be dangerous:
>>
>> <http://www.danielsen.com/jokes/objecttoaster.txt>
>>
>
> And Prolog is only good to find new aspects in your family - fathers, mothers,
> uncles, children.
>
> And Lisp is just the best choice to find the greatest common denominator.
>
> no links about that, my experience. I guess the list of irrelevant programming
> examples is ever growing, to infinity.
>
Loads of Irrelevant Superfluous Parentheses, isn't it?
If you can't code, talk about programming languages and if you can't
even do that, design a new one based on some Obscure Academic Principle.
> /Str.
--
To people who know nothing, anything is possible.
To people who know too much, it is a sad fact
that they know how little is really possible -
and how hard it is to achieve it.
|
|
|
|
Calendar
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
]