FUDforum
Fast Uncompromising Discussions. FUDforum will get your users talking.

Home » Imported messages » comp.lang.php » PHP mysql_excape but need to search for those items
Show: Today's Messages :: Polls :: Message Navigator
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: PHP mysql_excape but need to search for those items [message #178403 is a reply to message #178401] Thu, 14 June 2012 11:40 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
Jerry Stuckle is currently offline  Jerry Stuckle
Messages: 2598
Registered: September 2010
Karma:
Senior Member
On 6/14/2012 2:47 AM, Arno Welzel wrote:
> Jerry Stuckle, 12.06.2012 14:00:
>
>> On 6/12/2012 5:35 AM, Arno Welzel wrote:
>>> Jerry Stuckle, 11.06.2012 23:06:
>>>
>>>> On 6/11/2012 2:38 PM, J.O. Aho wrote:
>>> [...]
>>>> > Don't forget man in the middle, using https will not protect against
>>>> > that.
>>>>
>>>> Actually, it will. HTTPS transmissions are encrypted between the client
>>>> and the server using public/private key encryption. That's the whole
>>>> purpose of HTTPS.
>>>
>>> But only if the client *only* trusts the specific certificate. Otherwise
>>> the man in the middle can just set up a proxy which also accepts SSL
>>> connections and provides a valid certificate. There have been a number
>>> of broken CAs in the past which allowed virtually anyone to create
>>> signed and "trusted" certificates for any domain
>>
>> Setting up a proxy would mean alternations to the domain name servers
>> data. Additionally, the certificate either would not match the domain
>> name or the certificate would not be signed by a recognized authority
>> (which is a good reason to use a trusted certificate).
>
> Nameservers can be compromised - e.g. by cache poisoning.
>

And exactly how often has that occurred? And who has the tools to do it?

>> I don't know of any broken CAs in the past, but there could have been.
>> However, the ones I use won't issue a certificate just to anyone.
>
> And these are?
>

Thwate, for one. Verisign for another.

> Just as a reminder: DigiNotar, Comodo, RSA - just to name a few who
> already got compromised.
>
> Also see:
>
> < http://blogs.comodo.com/it-security/data-security/the-recent-ra-compromise/>
>
> < http://www.itscolumn.com/2011/09/certificate-authority-hacked-google-faced- mitm-attack/>
>
> The whole model of trusting CAs and not single certificates (as in SSH)
> must be considered broken.
>
>

And you have a better solution?

--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
JDS Computer Training Corp.
jstucklex(at)attglobal(dot)net
==================
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Using count() as an array index
Next Topic: can't modify include path
Goto Forum:
  

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ]

Current Time: Fri Nov 22 09:30:05 GMT 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.03479 seconds