Re: How can i know the propery of a javascript object how can i see what object inclue [message #178931 is a reply to message #178930] |
Sun, 26 August 2012 15:42 |
Christoph Becker
Messages: 91 Registered: June 2012
Karma:
|
Member |
|
|
Jerry Stuckle wrote:
> On 8/26/2012 9:46 AM, Christoph Becker wrote:
>> Jerry Stuckle wrote:
>>> On 8/22/2012 6:36 PM, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
>>>> Robert Heller wrote:
>>>>
>>>> > Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex(at)attglobal(dot)net> wrote:
>>>> >> On 8/22/2012 1:18 AM, sismaster wrote:
>>>> >>> i want to know how can i see what object include in java script
>>>> >>> and is
>>>> >>> there any tool to see what object contains
[snip]
>>> And how can PHP see what objects are included in Javascript?
>>
>> Actually it can't. But Thomas didn't say so (please note the carets,
>> which might not be aligned properly in the news reader, but are so in
>> the source code of the message).
>>
>> Sincerely,
>>
>
> No, but that was the original question, wasn't it?
I'm not sure about that. In fact the OP didn't even mention PHP. Well,
he posted on c.l.php, but it might well have been the wrong newsgroup. I
*guess* the OP just wanted to know some way to inspect JS objects, what
was already answered by Robert. But I may be wrong with this guess, as
I'm no native English speaker (what's probably quite obvious).
> But Pointed Head did indicate I was wrong on two accounts. And you
> haven't said anything to prove otherwise.
Actually I've just answered the questions *you* had asked (even if the
were rhetorical). I cannot prove neither of you right or wrong. The
statement "PHP runs on the server; Javascript runs on the client." is
not true in every case, even if it's typically true for PHP development.
And I won't argue, if the name "Javascript" is correct in this context,
or if one should use "ECMAScript" or point out that it's called
"JScript" on IE.
> IOW, he just opened his fat trap to hear himself talk, as usual.
I can't acknowledge that statement. ISTM Thomas has quite some knowledge
about web development, and I have learned from him, as I have from you.
> And, as usual, he's showing his ignorance (as are you).
Would you have replied, if somebody had called you "Jerry Struggle",
"stoopid" and "O great one"?
--
Christoph M.Becker
|
|
|