FUDforum
Fast Uncompromising Discussions. FUDforum will get your users talking.

Home » Imported messages » comp.lang.php » How can i know the propery of a javascript object how can i see what object inclue
Show: Today's Messages :: Polls :: Message Navigator
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: How can i know the propery of a javascript object how can i see what object inclue [message #178932 is a reply to message #178929] Sun, 26 August 2012 15:35 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
Peter H. Coffin is currently offline  Peter H. Coffin
Messages: 245
Registered: September 2010
Karma:
Senior Member
On Sun, 26 Aug 2012 15:46:31 +0200, Christoph Becker wrote:
> Jerry Stuckle wrote:
>> ROFLMAO! "Pointed Head" shows his stoopidity once again.
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^
> Who? ;-)
>>
>> So tell me, oh great one, exactly which browsers can run PHP code?
>
> I'm actually no "great one", but I can answer this question: at least on
> all browsers, which implement the NPAPI. I'm not aware of any
> PHP-Browser-Plugin, but it can be written, so PHP *can* run on browsers.
>
>> And how many servers are actually running Javascript?
>
> That's not the point. You've said "PHP runs on the server; Javascript
> runs on the client", what might be easily lead to the wrong assumption,
> that "Javascript" can't run on the server.

Perhaps this would be better phrased as "generally doesn't" rather than
as "theoretically could, if someone were to write and install
special-purpose code in order to do so." The point of the vast majoritiy
fo the discussion here is (aside from the nits that pointy Tommy
and a couple others try to pick) is whether something can be done
for/with J. Random Browser, using a typical load or something someone
could reasonably make into a requirement to us a web app.

>> And how can PHP see what objects are included in Javascript?
>
> Actually it can't. But Thomas didn't say so (please note the carets,
> which might not be aligned properly in the news reader, but are so in
> the source code of the message).

That was the point of the original post, to which Jerry said "no, it
can't" and Thomas said "It sure can!" and linked to something that
didn't do that.

--
Don't even get me started on the MCSEs I know. It's a miracle of
modern technology that some of these fsckwits still draw breath,
much less a paycheck.
-- Marc Bowden
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: DOMDocument::saveHTML() Method Not Accepting Single Argument
Next Topic: Sending nothing when function expects variable
Goto Forum:
  

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ]

Current Time: Wed Nov 27 22:11:24 GMT 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.04680 seconds