FUDforum
Fast Uncompromising Discussions. FUDforum will get your users talking.

Home » Imported messages » comp.lang.php » How can i know the propery of a javascript object how can i see what object inclue
Show: Today's Messages :: Polls :: Message Navigator
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: How can i know the propery of a javascript object how can i see what object inclue [message #178946 is a reply to message #178945] Mon, 27 August 2012 00:59 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
Christoph Becker is currently offline  Christoph Becker
Messages: 91
Registered: June 2012
Karma:
Member
Jerry Stuckle wrote:
> On 8/26/2012 11:42 AM, Christoph Becker wrote:
>> Jerry Stuckle wrote:
>>> On 8/26/2012 9:46 AM, Christoph Becker wrote:
>>>> Jerry Stuckle wrote:
>>>> > On 8/22/2012 6:36 PM, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
>>>> >> Robert Heller wrote:
>>>> >>
>>>> >>> Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex(at)attglobal(dot)net> wrote:
>>>> >>>> On 8/22/2012 1:18 AM, sismaster wrote:
>>>> >>>>> i want to know how can i see what object include in java script
>>>> >>>>> and is
>>>> >>>>> there any tool to see what object contains
>>
>> [snip]
>>
>>>> > And how can PHP see what objects are included in Javascript?
>>>>
>>>> Actually it can't. But Thomas didn't say so (please note the carets,
>>>> which might not be aligned properly in the news reader, but are so in
>>>> the source code of the message).
>>>>
>>>> Sincerely,
>>>>
>>>
>>> No, but that was the original question, wasn't it?
>>
>> I'm not sure about that. In fact the OP didn't even mention PHP. Well,
>> he posted on c.l.php, but it might well have been the wrong newsgroup. I
>> *guess* the OP just wanted to know some way to inspect JS objects, what
>> was already answered by Robert. But I may be wrong with this guess, as
>> I'm no native English speaker (what's probably quite obvious).
>>
>
> He posted in a PHP newsgroup, so my answer was in relation to PHP. If
> he wanted something else, he should have been more clear (or posted in a
> more appropriate newsgroup).
>
>
>>> But Pointed Head did indicate I was wrong on two accounts. And you
>>> haven't said anything to prove otherwise.
>>
>> Actually I've just answered the questions *you* had asked (even if the
>> were rhetorical). I cannot prove neither of you right or wrong. The
>> statement "PHP runs on the server; Javascript runs on the client." is
>> not true in every case, even if it's typically true for PHP development.
>> And I won't argue, if the name "Javascript" is correct in this context,
>> or if one should use "ECMAScript" or point out that it's called
>> "JScript" on IE.
>>
>
> Nope. The question was real. How many browsers can run PHP code?

*can*? AISB: at least all that implement the NPAPI, assuming that a PHP
browser plugin *can* be (or already have been?) written.

> And
> how many web servers actually run Javascript (I'm not counting wanna-be
> developers who are running 50 hit/mo. sites out of their basement, where
> 49 of those hits are from the site owner).

See e.g. <http://w3techs.com/technologies/details/pl-js/all/all>.
w3techs's only counting the top 1,000,000 sites. So currently 250 of
the top million websites are running Javascript (assumably all of them
have far more than 50 hits/mo.). And please note the trend: in 9 months
the usage has doubled!

>>> IOW, he just opened his fat trap to hear himself talk, as usual.
>>
>> I can't acknowledge that statement. ISTM Thomas has quite some knowledge
>> about web development, and I have learned from him, as I have from you.
>>
>
> Not in this group he isn't. And not in several other groups, where he's
> also recognized as a troll.
>
>>> And, as usual, he's showing his ignorance (as are you).
>>
>> Would you have replied, if somebody had called you "Jerry Struggle",
>> "stoopid" and "O great one"?
>>
>
> I've been called worse. And by better people than you.

My apologies, as it seems I have not expressed myself properly. I
didn't mean to insult you in any way. This was merely meant as a
"translation" (sorry, I'm lacking the appropriate word) of your reply to
Thomas, which might have been appropriate as reply to a troll -- which
IMHO Thomas isn't -- but every reader should decide for himself.

And yes, I'm quite aware that there are better people than me. Thanks
for reminding me.

--
Christoph M. Becker
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: DOMDocument::saveHTML() Method Not Accepting Single Argument
Next Topic: Sending nothing when function expects variable
Goto Forum:
  

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ]

Current Time: Sun Nov 10 12:52:01 GMT 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.05719 seconds