FUDforum
Fast Uncompromising Discussions. FUDforum will get your users talking.

Home » Imported messages » comp.lang.php » How can i know the propery of a javascript object how can i see what object inclue
Show: Today's Messages :: Polls :: Message Navigator
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: How can i know the propery of a javascript object how can i see what object inclue [message #178947 is a reply to message #178946] Mon, 27 August 2012 01:28 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
Jerry Stuckle is currently offline  Jerry Stuckle
Messages: 2598
Registered: September 2010
Karma:
Senior Member
On 8/26/2012 8:59 PM, Christoph Becker wrote:
> Jerry Stuckle wrote:
>> On 8/26/2012 11:42 AM, Christoph Becker wrote:
>>> Jerry Stuckle wrote:
>>>> On 8/26/2012 9:46 AM, Christoph Becker wrote:
>>>> > Jerry Stuckle wrote:
>>>> >> On 8/22/2012 6:36 PM, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
>>>> >>> Robert Heller wrote:
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>> Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex(at)attglobal(dot)net> wrote:
>>>> >>>>> On 8/22/2012 1:18 AM, sismaster wrote:
>>>> >>>>>> i want to know how can i see what object include in java script
>>>> >>>>>> and is
>>>> >>>>>> there any tool to see what object contains
>>>
>>> [snip]
>>>
>>>> >> And how can PHP see what objects are included in Javascript?
>>>> >
>>>> > Actually it can't. But Thomas didn't say so (please note the carets,
>>>> > which might not be aligned properly in the news reader, but are so in
>>>> > the source code of the message).
>>>> >
>>>> > Sincerely,
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>> No, but that was the original question, wasn't it?
>>>
>>> I'm not sure about that. In fact the OP didn't even mention PHP. Well,
>>> he posted on c.l.php, but it might well have been the wrong newsgroup. I
>>> *guess* the OP just wanted to know some way to inspect JS objects, what
>>> was already answered by Robert. But I may be wrong with this guess, as
>>> I'm no native English speaker (what's probably quite obvious).
>>>
>>
>> He posted in a PHP newsgroup, so my answer was in relation to PHP. If
>> he wanted something else, he should have been more clear (or posted in a
>> more appropriate newsgroup).
>>
>>
>>>> But Pointed Head did indicate I was wrong on two accounts. And you
>>>> haven't said anything to prove otherwise.
>>>
>>> Actually I've just answered the questions *you* had asked (even if the
>>> were rhetorical). I cannot prove neither of you right or wrong. The
>>> statement "PHP runs on the server; Javascript runs on the client." is
>>> not true in every case, even if it's typically true for PHP development.
>>> And I won't argue, if the name "Javascript" is correct in this context,
>>> or if one should use "ECMAScript" or point out that it's called
>>> "JScript" on IE.
>>>
>>
>> Nope. The question was real. How many browsers can run PHP code?
>
> *can*? AISB: at least all that implement the NPAPI, assuming that a PHP
> browser plugin *can* be (or already have been?) written.
>

Yes? And for just which browsers have those plugins been written? And
how many are in use?

We're not talking some theoretical possibility here. Please tell me how
I can run PHP on my browser TODAY. And which browser I can run it on.
Then let me know about how many other people in the world are doing that.

>> And
>> how many web servers actually run Javascript (I'm not counting wanna-be
>> developers who are running 50 hit/mo. sites out of their basement, where
>> 49 of those hits are from the site owner).
>
> See e.g. <http://w3techs.com/technologies/details/pl-js/all/all>.
> w3techs's only counting the top 1,000,000 sites. So currently 250 of
> the top million websites are running Javascript (assumably all of them
> have far more than 50 hits/mo.). And please note the trend: in 9 months
> the usage has doubled!
>

Yes, to quote:

"JavaScript is used by less than 0.1% of all the websites whose
server-side programming language we know." And, of course, they don't
know if the sites are actually USING server-side javascript. Only that
a plugin has been installed on the server.

But then that they have no real idea - it's just a guess. And even so,
the percentage is so low as to be immaterial. Let's see - 0.1% of 1M
sites - that means that *maybe* 1,000 have the plugin installed.

>>>> IOW, he just opened his fat trap to hear himself talk, as usual.
>>>
>>> I can't acknowledge that statement. ISTM Thomas has quite some knowledge
>>> about web development, and I have learned from him, as I have from you.
>>>
>>
>> Not in this group he isn't. And not in several other groups, where he's
>> also recognized as a troll.
>>
>>>> And, as usual, he's showing his ignorance (as are you).
>>>
>>> Would you have replied, if somebody had called you "Jerry Struggle",
>>> "stoopid" and "O great one"?
>>>
>>
>> I've been called worse. And by better people than you.
>
> My apologies, as it seems I have not expressed myself properly. I
> didn't mean to insult you in any way. This was merely meant as a
> "translation" (sorry, I'm lacking the appropriate word) of your reply to
> Thomas, which might have been appropriate as reply to a troll -- which
> IMHO Thomas isn't -- but every reader should decide for himself.
>
> And yes, I'm quite aware that there are better people than me. Thanks
> for reminding me.
>

You've expressed yourself quite well. No translation necessary.

--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
JDS Computer Training Corp.
jstucklex(at)attglobal(dot)net
==================
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: DOMDocument::saveHTML() Method Not Accepting Single Argument
Next Topic: Sending nothing when function expects variable
Goto Forum:
  

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ]

Current Time: Sun Nov 10 13:05:56 GMT 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.06759 seconds