Re: Current PHP implementation [message #180014 is a reply to message #180010] |
Wed, 26 December 2012 13:55 ![Go to previous message Go to previous message](/forum/theme/default/images/up.png) ![Go to next message Go to previous message](/forum/theme/default/images/down.png) |
Jerry Stuckle
Messages: 2598 Registered: September 2010
Karma:
|
Senior Member |
|
|
On 12/26/2012 5:43 AM, Tim Streater wrote:
> In article <hvvqq9-ept(dot)ln1(at)luuk(dot)invalid(dot)lan>, Luuk <luuk(at)invalid(dot)lan>
> wrote:
>
>> On 26-12-2012 03:45, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
>>> On 12/25/2012 8:51 PM, SL@maxis wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I ask this question in 'comp.unix.programmer. It seems like it is more
>>>> related to PHP.
>>>>
>>>> I ask here to find out the current PHP implementation.
>>>>
>>>> Assume at a given time 10 users send in AJAX calls; server end handled
>>>> by '123.php'.
>>>>
>>>> 1. Handler (script): 123.php
>>>>
>>>> Does the server initiate 10 processes to handle the calls ? Which
>> means
>>>> 10 processes are closed after processing !?
>>>>
>>>> 2. Handler (daemon): 123.php
>>>>
>>>> Is the daemon/server creating 10 threads to handle requests ? Which
>>>> means the daemon is always running. Please ignore the memory
>> problem of
>>>> PHP.
>
>>> PHP doesn't handle AJAX calls, nor does PHP start any processes. That
>>> is all done by the web server. You need to be asking in a newsgroup
>>> for the webserver you are using.
>
>> ants fucker
>>
>> What about the answer to this question,
>>
>> (after replacing the 'improper' described handling of PHP)
>
> Anyone understand what Luuk's reply means?
>
He has no idea what he's talking about.
--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
JDS Computer Training Corp.
jstucklex(at)attglobal(dot)net
==================
|
|
|