| Re: Information Theoretically Secure requirements scheme for improving and implementing intelligent encryption requiring human intervention or decision to be valid. [message #180196 is a reply to message #180195] |
Thu, 24 January 2013 17:27   |
unruh
Messages: 1
Registered: January 2013
Karma:
|
Junior Member |
|
|
On 2013-01-24, Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex(at)attglobal(dot)net> wrote:
> On 1/24/2013 12:10 AM, Martin Musatov wrote:
>>
>> The techniques all listed above and the intellectual property rights
>> associated with them are (C) Copyright 2013 Martin Musatov. They may
>> be used or adapted by any entity provided partial credit is provided
>> to Martin Musatov and is documented as well as when this occurs in
>> conjunction with a non-public donation to a charity equal to the value
>> of the contribution.
>>
>
> And not worth the bandwidth they took to process.
>
> BTW - you can copyright text (including code), but you cannot copyright
> a concept. If your concept were worth anything, anyone could use it at
> any time without any credit to you or any payment to anyone.
>
> If you want to protect a concept you need to patent it.
Except you cannot patent concepts either. You can patent things or
processes or designs, but not concepts or ideas.
And you cannot copyright "intellectual property". The category
"intellectual property" refers to things which a copyrightable,
patentable or trademarkable. It is not a category which has any
independent definition beyond the definition of those categories.
It is an entirely artificial concept with the word "property" used in a
purely mataphoric sense.
>
|
|
|
|
Calendar
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
]