FUDforum: comp.lang.php » bug in is

Home » Imported messages » comp.lang.php » bug in is_numeric

Show: Today's Messages :: Polls :: Message Navigator

Re: bug in is_numeric [message #181458 is a reply to message #181454]

Fri, 17 May 2013 16:33

Thomas 'PointedEars'
Messages: 701
Registered: October 2010

Karma:

Senior Member

SwissCheese wrote:

> On 05/16/2013 06:45 PM, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
>> SwissCheese wrote:
>>> On 05/15/2013 02:49 PM, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
>>>> Christoph Becker wrote:
>>>> > Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
>>>> >> to the above it should have returned TRUE).
>>>> >
>>>> > I can confirm issues with is_numeric() wrt. strings in binary notation
>>>> > in PHP 5.4.7:
>>>> >
>>>> > >>> is_numeric('0b1010')
>>>> > false
>>>> > >>> is_numeric(0b1010)
>>>> > true
>>>>
>>>> ACK. However, it is unsurprising to me that the latter would return
>>>> TRUE because there the literal is parsed into an “int” value *before*
>>>> it is passed to is_numeric(), the equivalent of is_numeric(10).
>>>>
>>>> I would rather the former bug was an implementation bug instead of a
>>>> documentation bug, because such a function should either work for all
>>>> supported numeric representations of the programming language, or there
>>>> should be a parameter specifying which representations are supported
>>>> for the specific call [like ECMAScripts parseInt(number : String, base
>>>> : Number) : Number].
>>>
>>> Thomas,
>>
>> This is NetNews, not e-mail.
>
> Um, ok. So you chastise people about using real names yet don't want
> yours used?

No, I am reminding you of the fact that I am not the only recipient of your
posting, even though your posting is a follow-up to mine.

>>> Looking into the source (PHP) there is no code to support binary
>>> strings of the type '0b1010101'. The code for hexadecimal is there
>>> however.
>>
>> AISB, testing with PHP does not help to resolve the basic issue here.
>> From such tests it is still unclear whether not supporting the binary
>> format is an implementation bug, i. e. an omission of supporting the
>> binary format introduced with PHP 5.4; or a documentation bug, i. e.
>> manual claiming that is_numeric() supports more than it is actually
>> supposed to.
>>
>> What would be interesting instead is to look at the source code from
>> which PHP 5.4 and particularly is_numeric() is built as that could at
>> least show if the octal format would be recognized, and if there was
>> support for the binary format that was just not properly triggered.
>
> Isn't that what I just mentioned I did ('Looking into the source
> code...') above?

I am not sure. Which source code have you been looking into?

> There is no support for binary numbers passed as strings in the form
> '0b101010'.

You are still missing the point. It is already clear to at least two people
here that there is no support. It is not clear why, as this format for
numeric literals was introduced only recently, and as the documentation
states something else.

> If you pass 0b101010 (not as a string) and it gets converted to an (int)
> on the way in then that's obviously not the same thing.

I am/We are aware of that.

> And what is so special about octal that is_numeric() would not recognise
> it?

It has no “8” figure.

> Who is this 'PointedEars', get a real name will you?

I sign my postings with the nickname under which I am known on the Net.
My first and last name are in the From header field value of my postings,
surrounding my nickname. Yours are not. Thus, you are not posting using
your real name, which is not considered polite on Usenet.

PointedEars
--
> If you get a bunch of authors […] that state the same "best practices"
> in any programming language, then you can bet who is wrong or right...
Not with javascript. Nonsense propagates like wildfire in this field.
-- Richard Cornford, comp.lang.javascript, 2011-11-14

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		bug in is_numeric By: fred on Sun, 12 May 2013 14:22
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Salvatore on Sun, 12 May 2013 15:31
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Luuk on Sun, 12 May 2013 15:55
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Luuk on Sun, 12 May 2013 15:58
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Thomas Mlynarczyk on Sun, 12 May 2013 16:06
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Denis McMahon on Sun, 12 May 2013 16:24
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: fred on Sun, 12 May 2013 17:41
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Erwin Moller on Mon, 13 May 2013 11:50
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: fred on Mon, 13 May 2013 13:58
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Jerry Stuckle on Mon, 13 May 2013 14:11
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: fred on Mon, 13 May 2013 14:15
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Erwin Moller on Mon, 13 May 2013 15:29
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: J.O. Aho on Mon, 13 May 2013 17:55
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Richard Yates on Tue, 14 May 2013 13:41
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: SwissCheese on Wed, 15 May 2013 01:43
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Jerry Stuckle on Wed, 15 May 2013 03:01
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: SwissCheese on Wed, 15 May 2013 09:48
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Jerry Stuckle on Wed, 15 May 2013 10:11
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: SwissCheese on Thu, 16 May 2013 22:36
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Thomas 'PointedEars' on Wed, 15 May 2013 13:19
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Christoph Becker on Wed, 15 May 2013 18:23
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Thomas 'PointedEars' on Wed, 15 May 2013 18:49
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Christoph Becker on Wed, 15 May 2013 19:58
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Thomas 'PointedEars' on Wed, 15 May 2013 20:20
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Christoph Becker on Wed, 15 May 2013 20:42
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Thomas Mlynarczyk on Wed, 15 May 2013 21:53
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Christoph Becker on Wed, 15 May 2013 22:29
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Christoph Becker on Wed, 15 May 2013 22:40
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Thomas 'PointedEars' on Thu, 16 May 2013 03:00
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: SwissCheese on Thu, 16 May 2013 22:16
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Thomas 'PointedEars' on Thu, 16 May 2013 22:45
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: SwissCheese on Fri, 17 May 2013 02:52
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Thomas 'PointedEars' on Fri, 17 May 2013 16:33
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Christoph Becker on Fri, 17 May 2013 18:39
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Thomas 'PointedEars' on Fri, 17 May 2013 21:45
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Christoph Becker on Sat, 18 May 2013 12:47
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: SwissCheese on Thu, 16 May 2013 00:57
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Jerry Stuckle on Thu, 16 May 2013 04:09
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Christoph Becker on Thu, 16 May 2013 23:17
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Jerry Stuckle on Fri, 17 May 2013 00:30
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Christoph Becker on Sat, 18 May 2013 12:51
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Jerry Stuckle on Sat, 18 May 2013 14:07
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Sanders Kaufman on Sat, 18 May 2013 16:56
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Jerry Stuckle on Sat, 18 May 2013 18:32
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Thomas 'PointedEars' on Sat, 18 May 2013 20:24
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Jerry Stuckle on Sat, 18 May 2013 21:01
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Denis McMahon on Sat, 18 May 2013 21:58
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Jerry Stuckle on Sat, 18 May 2013 23:21
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Denis McMahon on Sun, 19 May 2013 02:22
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Jerry Stuckle on Sun, 19 May 2013 02:41
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Sanders Kaufman on Sun, 19 May 2013 10:28
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Jerry Stuckle on Sun, 19 May 2013 13:42
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Sanders Kaufman on Sun, 19 May 2013 16:42
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Jerry Stuckle on Sun, 19 May 2013 18:39
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Sanders Kaufman on Tue, 21 May 2013 06:01
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Jerry Stuckle on Tue, 21 May 2013 09:59
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: The Natural Philosoph on Sun, 19 May 2013 06:49
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Sanders Kaufman on Sun, 19 May 2013 10:31
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: The Natural Philosoph on Sun, 19 May 2013 11:39
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Jerry Stuckle on Sun, 19 May 2013 13:43
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Sanders Kaufman on Sun, 19 May 2013 16:52
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Jerry Stuckle on Sun, 19 May 2013 18:42
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Sanders Kaufman on Tue, 21 May 2013 06:03
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Jerry Stuckle on Tue, 21 May 2013 10:00
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Sanders Kaufman on Sun, 19 May 2013 16:45
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Sanders Kaufman on Sun, 19 May 2013 10:27
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Jerry Stuckle on Sun, 19 May 2013 13:45
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Sanders Kaufman on Sun, 19 May 2013 16:37
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Jerry Stuckle on Sun, 19 May 2013 18:43
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Sanders Kaufman on Tue, 21 May 2013 05:59
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Jerry Stuckle on Tue, 21 May 2013 10:02
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Sanders Kaufman on Sat, 18 May 2013 22:08
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: The Natural Philosoph on Sat, 18 May 2013 22:58
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Jerry Stuckle on Sat, 18 May 2013 23:22
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Sanders Kaufman on Sat, 18 May 2013 22:11
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Jerry Stuckle on Sat, 18 May 2013 23:23
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Sanders Kaufman on Sun, 19 May 2013 10:35
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Jerry Stuckle on Sun, 19 May 2013 13:46
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Sanders Kaufman on Sun, 19 May 2013 16:23
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Jerry Stuckle on Sun, 19 May 2013 18:44
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Sanders Kaufman on Tue, 21 May 2013 05:54
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Jerry Stuckle on Tue, 21 May 2013 10:03
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: fred on Thu, 23 May 2013 14:38
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Arno Welzel on Sat, 01 June 2013 15:36
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Jerry Stuckle on Sat, 01 June 2013 18:54
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Arno Welzel on Wed, 05 June 2013 13:25
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Jerry Stuckle on Wed, 05 June 2013 14:34
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Arno Welzel on Wed, 05 June 2013 15:02
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Jerry Stuckle on Wed, 05 June 2013 16:30
		OT: What you say is not always what you mean (was: Re: bug in is_numeric) By: Arno Welzel on Wed, 05 June 2013 18:20
		Re: OT: What you say is not always what you mean By: Jerry Stuckle on Wed, 05 June 2013 18:40
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Thomas 'PointedEars' on Sat, 18 May 2013 19:51
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Sanders Kaufman on Sat, 18 May 2013 22:13
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Thomas 'PointedEars' on Sat, 18 May 2013 22:49
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Sanders Kaufman on Sun, 19 May 2013 10:24
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Thomas 'PointedEars' on Sun, 19 May 2013 10:40
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: The Natural Philosoph on Sun, 19 May 2013 11:43
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Sanders Kaufman on Sun, 19 May 2013 16:29
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Norman Peelman on Sat, 18 May 2013 18:53
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: SwissCheese on Thu, 16 May 2013 22:41
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Daniel Pitts on Mon, 13 May 2013 15:35
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Denis McMahon on Mon, 13 May 2013 20:26
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Denis McMahon on Mon, 13 May 2013 20:15
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Robert Heller on Sun, 12 May 2013 18:03
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Thomas 'PointedEars' on Sun, 12 May 2013 16:03
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: fred on Sun, 12 May 2013 17:34
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Thomas 'PointedEars' on Sun, 12 May 2013 17:40
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Luuk on Sun, 12 May 2013 19:51
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Sanders Kaufman on Sun, 12 May 2013 16:47
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Luuk on Sun, 12 May 2013 16:56
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Thomas Mlynarczyk on Sun, 12 May 2013 17:05
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Thomas 'PointedEars' on Sun, 12 May 2013 17:38
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Thomas 'PointedEars' on Sun, 12 May 2013 17:46
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Jerry Stuckle on Sun, 12 May 2013 18:11
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Thomas 'PointedEars' on Sun, 12 May 2013 18:39
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Jerry Stuckle on Sun, 12 May 2013 20:51
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Thomas 'PointedEars' on Sun, 12 May 2013 23:27
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Jerry Stuckle on Mon, 13 May 2013 00:35
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Thomas 'PointedEars' on Mon, 13 May 2013 09:07
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Jerry Stuckle on Mon, 13 May 2013 13:02
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Thomas 'PointedEars' on Mon, 13 May 2013 14:57
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Thomas 'PointedEars' on Mon, 13 May 2013 15:10
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Jerry Stuckle on Mon, 13 May 2013 17:52
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Thomas 'PointedEars' on Mon, 13 May 2013 18:28
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: SwissCheese on Thu, 16 May 2013 22:28
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Thomas 'PointedEars' on Thu, 16 May 2013 22:33
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: SwissCheese on Fri, 17 May 2013 02:34
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Thomas 'PointedEars' on Sat, 18 May 2013 08:28
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Norman Peelman on Sat, 18 May 2013 12:00
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Luuk on Sat, 18 May 2013 12:18
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Tim Streater on Sat, 18 May 2013 12:20
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Jerry Stuckle on Sat, 18 May 2013 12:47
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: The Natural Philosoph on Sat, 18 May 2013 13:05
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Jerry Stuckle on Sat, 18 May 2013 14:16
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Thomas 'PointedEars' on Sat, 18 May 2013 14:14
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Sandman on Tue, 14 May 2013 08:34
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: fred on Tue, 14 May 2013 13:47
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Denis McMahon on Tue, 14 May 2013 14:54
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Sandman on Wed, 15 May 2013 06:05
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Jerry Stuckle on Wed, 15 May 2013 10:27
		Re: bug in is_numeric By: Erwin Moller on Wed, 15 May 2013 11:11

Previous Topic:	problem encrypting data (AES_ENCRYPT/AES_DECRYPT)
Next Topic:	Debian: php fast-cgi along with mod_php

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

]

Current Time: Sat Nov 23 06:51:17 GMT 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.07271 seconds