Re: A general note on invalid.com and others like it [message #183025 is a reply to message #183016] |
Thu, 03 October 2013 18:06 |
bill
Messages: 310 Registered: October 2010
Karma:
|
Senior Member |
|
|
On 2013-10-02 8:23 PM, Fiver wrote:
> On 2013-10-03 02:03, Twayne wrote:
>> On 2013-10-02 6:31 PM, Fiver wrote:
>>> On 2013-10-03 00:07, Peter H. Coffin wrote:
>>>> "invalid.com" != ".invalid"
>>>
>>> My point precisely. Nobody here was using "invalid.com".
>
>> A quick search of my archives showed it uniquely listed 26 times; so ...
>
> Must have been a while ago. I only loaded 2k headers going back to
> January this year, and there are no occurrences of invalid.com. I have
> no doubt that your archives are more extensive, so I defer to your
> judgement about the need for a public service announcement.
>
> regards,
> 5er
>
Hi 5,
Not wanting to make you "defer"; just making a statement. I had
hoped people would just try the URL and maybe look them up on whois or
their fav place. The only point was to get folks to use something made
for the purpose - and not make up addresses on a whim.
Twayne`
|
|
|