Re: Thank you very much for the response.... [message #27343 is a reply to message #21548] |
Mon, 05 September 2005 15:40 |
ctbk
Messages: 142 Registered: April 2002 Location: Milan, Italy
Karma:
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Watchnut wrote on Fri, 03 December 2004 01:34 | .....was hoping there was a real-world setup of FUD that was about an order of magnitude larger (that is, roughly 5 million posts housed across multiple forums). I'm trying to gauge whether re-indexing of the database on deleted and edits of posts is going to make the software unacceptably slow. Also trying to gauge the efficiency of the search engine on a setup of that magnitude.
Regards,
Michael
|
I'm bringing back this thread to ask a question. Anyone has any exprerience with very large forums managed by fud? We've got a forum containing 3.000.000+ messages, and it seems that recently we reached some kind of magic number, because database performance has suddenly become unbearably poor. The cause of all this is the indexing, of course: disabling search functionalities the forum gets blazing fast at once. fud2_index contains 54.000.000+ rows.
We are still using an old version (2.5.0) of the software and we are wondering if something adressing this specific issue has been done in the meanwhile to make an upgrade worth it. You can understand how traumatic could be an upgrade in a forum of such dimensions, and we cannot take any chance unless some drastic optimization hasn't been done. The forum, otherwise, runs perfectly, and this problem presented itself only in the last weeks: we suspect that after a while wait-times grow exponentially instead of linearly.
In your opinion, would be difficult to write a hack to delegate this specific indexing/searching task to another application (running on another machine, for example)?
thanx
~
~
:wq
|
|
|