FUDforum: Bug Reports » Bugs in 1.1.9-dev (from CVS @ 8:30am Feb 12)

Home » FUDforum Development » Bug Reports » Bugs in 1.1.9-dev (from CVS @ 8:30am Feb 12)

Show: Today's Messages :: Polls :: Message Navigator

Re: Bugs in 1.1.9-dev (from CVS @ 8:30am Feb 12) [message #441 is a reply to message #440]

Tue, 12 February 2002 20:16

hackie

Messages: 177
Registered: January 2002

Karma:

Senior Member
Core Developer

prottoss wrote on Tue, 12 February 2002 2:43 PM

Okie, the lastest CVS should have a fix for this.

The problem was entirely Windows' fault. In windows when you open file for append ftell() will always return 0 unless you write some data to the file. Our code being UNIX centric got the start position of the message by doing an ftell().
Windows programmers consider this a "feature" of NTFS' implementation of file permissions. Since NTFS allows a (real append) permission you cannot overwrite data before you aquired the file in append mode.
We've added a filesize() hack to hopeful solve this bug in Windows.

(grab forum_install/install_data/sys/include/post.inc & forum_install/install_data/sys/include/private.inc)

To test the fix you'll need to create new threads, the old ones that were affected by this problem cannot be fixed.

More specifically, old threads will not be fixed UPTO the point of where you replace the files which don't currently consider windows' implemenation of fopen(...,'a').

cc intelligence.c -o intelligence
$ ./intelligence
Segmentation fault

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Bugs in 1.1.9-dev (from CVS @ 8:30am Feb 12) By: ironstorm on Tue, 12 February 2002 15:34
		Bugs in 1.1.9-dev (from CVS @ 8:30am Feb 12) #2 By: ironstorm on Tue, 12 February 2002 16:07
		Bugs in 1.1.9-dev (from CVS @ 8:30am Feb 12) #3 By: ironstorm on Tue, 12 February 2002 16:28
		Bugs in 1.1.9-dev (from CVS @ 8:30am Feb 12) #4 By: ironstorm on Tue, 12 February 2002 16:31
		Re: Bugs in 1.1.9-dev (from CVS @ 8:30am Feb 12) By: Ilia on Tue, 12 February 2002 17:46
		Re: Bugs in 1.1.9-dev (from CVS @ 8:30am Feb 12) By: Ilia on Tue, 12 February 2002 16:47
		Re: Bugs in 1.1.9-dev (from CVS @ 8:30am Feb 12) By: Ilia on Tue, 12 February 2002 17:17
		Re: Bugs in 1.1.9-dev (from CVS @ 8:30am Feb 12) By: Ilia on Tue, 12 February 2002 16:33
		Bugs in 1.1.9-dev (from CVS @ 8:30am Feb 12) #5 By: ironstorm on Tue, 12 February 2002 16:58
		Re: Bugs in 1.1.9-dev (from CVS @ 8:30am Feb 12) By: Ilia on Tue, 12 February 2002 17:53
		Re: Bugs in 1.1.9-dev (from CVS @ 8:30am Feb 12) By: ironstorm on Tue, 12 February 2002 18:49
		Re: Bugs in 1.1.9-dev (from CVS @ 8:30am Feb 12) By: Ilia on Tue, 12 February 2002 18:54
		Re: Bugs in 1.1.9-dev (from CVS @ 8:30am Feb 12) By: ironstorm on Tue, 12 February 2002 20:31
		Re: Bugs in 1.1.9-dev (from CVS @ 8:30am Feb 12) By: Ilia on Tue, 12 February 2002 20:40
		Re: Bugs in 1.1.9-dev (from CVS @ 8:30am Feb 12) By: ironstorm on Tue, 12 February 2002 21:10
		Re: Bugs in 1.1.9-dev (from CVS @ 8:30am Feb 12) By: Ilia on Tue, 12 February 2002 21:14
		Re: Bugs in 1.1.9-dev (from CVS @ 8:30am Feb 12) By: ironstorm on Tue, 12 February 2002 22:11
		Re: Bugs in 1.1.9-dev (from CVS @ 8:30am Feb 12) By: Ilia on Tue, 12 February 2002 22:17
		Re: Bugs in 1.1.9-dev (from CVS @ 8:30am Feb 12) By: ironstorm on Wed, 13 February 2002 02:04
		Re: Bugs in 1.1.9-dev (from CVS @ 8:30am Feb 12) By: ironstorm on Wed, 13 February 2002 03:07
		Re: Bugs in 1.1.9-dev (from CVS @ 8:30am Feb 12) By: Ilia on Wed, 13 February 2002 03:10
		Re: Bugs in 1.1.9-dev (from CVS @ 8:30am Feb 12) By: Ilia on Tue, 12 February 2002 19:43
		Re: Bugs in 1.1.9-dev (from CVS @ 8:30am Feb 12) By: hackie on Tue, 12 February 2002 20:16
		Re: Bugs in 1.1.9-dev (from CVS @ 8:30am Feb 12) By: ironstorm on Wed, 13 February 2002 02:52
		Re: Bugs in 1.1.9-dev (from CVS @ 8:30am Feb 12) By: ironstorm on Wed, 13 February 2002 02:53
		Re: Bugs in 1.1.9-dev (from CVS @ 8:30am Feb 12) By: Ilia on Wed, 13 February 2002 02:55
		Re: Bugs in 1.1.9-dev (from CVS @ 8:30am Feb 12) By: ironstorm on Wed, 13 February 2002 03:00
		Re: Bugs in 1.1.9-dev (from CVS @ 8:30am Feb 12) By: ironstorm on Wed, 13 February 2002 05:04
		Re: Bugs in 1.1.9-dev (from CVS @ 8:30am Feb 12) By: Ilia on Wed, 13 February 2002 05:10
		Re: Bugs in 1.1.9-dev (from CVS @ 8:30am Feb 12) By: ironstorm on Wed, 13 February 2002 05:14
		Re: Bugs in 1.1.9-dev (from CVS @ 8:30am Feb 12) By: ironstorm on Wed, 13 February 2002 05:17
		Re: Bugs in 1.1.9-dev (from CVS @ 8:30am Feb 12) By: Ilia on Wed, 13 February 2002 05:19
		Re: Bugs in 1.1.9-dev (from CVS @ 8:30am Feb 12) By: ironstorm on Wed, 13 February 2002 05:23
		Re: Bugs in 1.1.9-dev (from CVS @ 8:30am Feb 12) By: Ilia on Wed, 13 February 2002 05:25
		Re: Bugs in 1.1.9-dev (from CVS @ 8:30am Feb 12) By: ironstorm on Wed, 13 February 2002 05:28
		Re: Bugs in 1.1.9-dev (from CVS @ 8:30am Feb 12) By: Ilia on Wed, 13 February 2002 05:39
		Re: Bugs in 1.1.9-dev (from CVS @ 8:30am Feb 12) By: ironstorm on Wed, 13 February 2002 05:41
		Re: Bugs in 1.1.9-dev (from CVS @ 8:30am Feb 12) By: ironstorm on Wed, 13 February 2002 05:44
		Re: Bugs in 1.1.9-dev (from CVS @ 8:30am Feb 12) By: Ilia on Wed, 13 February 2002 06:01
		Re: Bugs in 1.1.9-dev (from CVS @ 8:30am Feb 12) By: ironstorm on Wed, 13 February 2002 06:02
		Re: Bugs in 1.1.9-dev (from CVS @ 8:30am Feb 12) By: ironstorm on Wed, 13 February 2002 06:05
		Re: Bugs in 1.1.9-dev (from CVS @ 8:30am Feb 12) By: Ilia on Wed, 13 February 2002 06:08
		Re: Bugs in 1.1.9-dev (from CVS @ 8:30am Feb 12) By: ironstorm on Wed, 13 February 2002 06:07
		Re: Bugs in 1.1.9-dev (from CVS @ 8:30am Feb 12) By: Ilia on Wed, 13 February 2002 06:11
		Re: Bugs in 1.1.9-dev (from CVS @ 8:30am Feb 12) By: ironstorm on Wed, 13 February 2002 06:14
		Re: Bugs in 1.1.9-dev (from CVS @ 8:30am Feb 12) By: hackie on Wed, 13 February 2002 17:48

Previous Topic:	Comments on installing FUD 1.1.1 on Win2K
Next Topic:	Need Help - pro i did the consistancy check and i have an error

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

]

Current Time: Thu Dec 12 18:34:47 GMT 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.04398 seconds